Change in Electric Potential from the Surface of a Conducting Sphere to Infinity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric potential difference between the surface of a conducting spherical shell and infinity, with a focus on a specific charge distribution. The user notes that the potential change from the center to the inner surface of the shell is 0V, as is the change between points on the shell itself. The user initially struggled with unit conversion, confusing nanocoulombs with microcoulombs, which led to errors in their calculations. The concept of electric potential is emphasized, highlighting the work needed to bring a test charge from infinity to the charged surface. Ultimately, understanding the relationship between charge and electric potential is key to resolving the user's confusion.
jhfrey89
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Let me preface this as this is my first post on this forum. I'm a physics major at Virginia Tech and I've lurked the forum for a while to help understand concepts that may not be intuitive initially. I'm stuck on this one concept, so I decided to give posting a shot.

Without further ado...

1. An insulating spherical shell with inner radius 25.0 cm and outer radius 60.0 cm carries a charge of + 150.0 \muC uniformly distributed over its outer surface. Point a is at the center of the shell, point b is on the inner surface and point c is on the outer surface.

What will a voltmeter read if it is connected between c and infinity?




2. Given \intE*dl = V, I'd be integrating over infinity because it's an infinite path to... infinity.



3. It's more conceptual than anything, so I'm really at a loss. The change in potential from the center of the shell to the inner surface is 0V, and the change between the shell itself is 0V, as it's a conductor.

I'd rather just get the concept than someone spit out a solution.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Stupid me. I was right - I just messed up my units (read it as nano rather than micro).

Thanks anyways!
 
So then...how did you do this?
 
Well, think about it. If you have a charge, be it a point charge, sphere, or spherical shell, then it has some electric potential. If you bring in a test charge from infinity, you're going to have to do the that amount of work on it to bring it to the charge (assuming the point charge with the potential is a positive charge). It's the summation of all the work from infinity to the surface of the sphere.

My issue was that I was using a nanocoulomb rather than a microcoulomb, so I was off by a power of 10^3.
 
oh, I see. Makes sense. Thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top