Change in energy between system of point charges

AI Thread Summary
The energy stored in a system of three identical point charges at the vertices of an equilateral triangle is 15 Joules. When one charge is moved to the midpoint of the opposite side, the new energy configuration is calculated to be 25 Joules. The difference in energy between the two configurations is determined to be 10 Joules. The initial calculations were confirmed to be correct, with some clarification on the mathematical setup. Overall, the discussion emphasizes understanding the relationship between charge distance and energy in point charge systems.
z0k
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The energy stored by any pair of positive charges is inversely proportional to the distance between them, and directly proportional to their charges. Three identical point charges start at the vertices of an equilateral triangle, and this configuration stores 15 Joules of energy. How much more energy, in Joules, would be stored if one of these charges was moved to the midpoint of the opposite side?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



We determine our formula to be $$U = \frac{kq^2}{r}.$$ Then from the given data, for three point charges we have $$U = 3 \frac{kq^2}{r} = 15J.$$ To compute the new position:

$$
U' = k(\frac{q^2}{r/2} + \frac{q^2}{r/2} + \frac{q^2}{r}) \\
U' = 5 \frac{kq^2}{r} \\
U' = 25J \\

$$

So the difference is $$U' - U = 10J.$$

I'm not quite sure if I am going about this the right way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you have gone about it almost the right way. I think the problem is where you did 1/2 + 1/2 + 1 = 5 This is not right.

PS welcome to physicsforums! :)

EDIT: I am tired and didn't read your post through properly. Sorry. Your maths was 2 + 2 + 1 = 5 which is of course correct. I think your answer is all OK, why do you think it is wrong?
 
Sorry, I think my typesetting make the fractions look confusing. I'm still learning to use Tex properly.
I just wanted to make sure that my set up was correct.
Thank you for your help and for the welcome!
 
yep, no worries :)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top