Change in energy in orbiting satellite.

AI Thread Summary
A satellite with a mass of 45.5 kg transitions from an orbit of 7271 km to 7356 km around Earth. The total energies for both orbits were calculated as -1.2458 GJ for the lower orbit and -1.2315 GJ for the higher orbit. The difference in these energy values indicates the work done by all forces acting on the satellite during the transition. The discussion highlights the importance of considering both potential and kinetic energies in the calculations. Ultimately, the problem emphasizes using conservation of energy principles to determine the work done.
Gianf
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A satellite of mass 45.5 kg orbiting the Earth moves from an orbit of 7271 km to an orbit of 7356 km.
what is the work done by all forces acting on it?


Homework Equations


U=GMm/r


The Attempt at a Solution


I calculated the total energies of the satellite in both orbits which is -1/2GMm/r
This gave -1.2458Gj for the lower orbit and -1.2315 for the higher one.
Should the difference be the total work done?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gianf said:

Homework Statement


A satellite of mass 45.5 kg orbiting the Earth moves from an orbit of 7271 km to an orbit of 7356 km.
what is the work done by all forces acting on it?


Homework Equations


U=GMm/r


The Attempt at a Solution


I calculated the total energies of the satellite in both orbits which is -1/2GMm/r
This gave -1.2458Gj for the lower orbit and -1.2315 for the higher one.
Should the difference be the total work done?

It says find the work done by all the forces acting on it.

Contemplate the possibility that this is a 'trick' question.
 
I've been thinking about this question all day... still don't get it
what would the trick be?
 
Sorry, I think I misread the question. Actually, it's a bit misty. My reading of it now is that there was a circular orbit of 7272 km which gets moved to a NEW circular orbit of 7356 km.

Just use conservation of energy but remember to include potential and kinetic energies.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top