Change in gravitational potential energy and work done against gravity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the change in gravitational potential energy and the work done against gravity for a child cycling up a hill. The child’s mass is 46.0 kg, and the vertical height is 5.25 m, leading to a calculated change in gravitational potential energy of 2366.7 J. However, there is confusion regarding the calculation of work done, with an incorrect attempt to subtract gravitational acceleration from energy units. Participants emphasize the need to use correct formulas and units, indicating that the approach to finding work done needs clarification. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between potential energy and work in physics.
Amber3046
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a 46.0kg child cycles up a large hill to a point that is vertical distance of 5.25m above the starting position find:
a.) The change in the childs gravitational potential energy
b.) The amount of work done by the child against gravity


Homework Equations


delta Eg=mg delta h?
W=delta Eg-g?


The Attempt at a Solution


delta Eg=(46.0kg)(9.80m/s2)(5.25m)
delta Eg=2366.7 J {This number seems too high though, and it wouldn't be the change. I don't know how to get that}
W=2366.7-9.80
W=2356.9J


 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first part is ok, that is the change..

But for the second part, are you sure can do that??
Check the units..., you are subtracting joules from m/s^2
 
Thaakisfox said:
The first part is ok, that is the change..

But for the second part, are you sure can do that??
Check the units..., you are subtracting joules from m/s^2

I don't know if you can do that. It was just my guess, do you know how to do that?
 
what is the formula for the amount of work done that's given in your book. Write all of them
 
Well of course you can't do that. What was your line of thought that got you there? Maybe we can clear it up then ;)
 
Thaakisfox said:
Well of course you can't do that. What was your line of thought that got you there? Maybe we can clear it up then ;)

My line of thought was that I would take the Gravitational Potential Energy and subtract the acceleration of gravity (9.81m/s^2). I don't think that it's right, that was just something I tried.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top