Change in the kinetic energy of a car driving up a hill

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the change in kinetic energy of a car driving up a hill, emphasizing that the value of velocity (v) is not needed for this specific calculation. Participants clarify that the resistive force of 440 is used to determine the work done against it, which is essential for calculating the total energy required to move the car uphill. The correct approach involves considering both gravitational potential energy and work against resistive forces. The final calculation yields a time of approximately 3.5 seconds for the car to ascend the hill, confirming the accuracy of the computations. Overall, the thread highlights the importance of understanding forces and energy in motion for solving physics problems.
hello478
Messages
165
Reaction score
14
Homework Statement
mentions below in picture
Relevant Equations
energy equations
and work done = f*d moved in direction of force
part i)
i did 1/2 * 1700 * v^2
i dont know what v is...
so how do i solve it?

part ii)
i calculated it correctly by 440*25
please explain in detail why i used 440?

and part d)
i did 1.7*10^4 = 48000/t
my t= 2.82 s
but correct answer is 3.5s

1711478019040.png


1711478679135.png
 

Attachments

  • 1711478005274.png
    1711478005274.png
    23.3 KB · Views: 72
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
hello478 said:
i dont know what v is...
You aren't being asked to calculate the kinetic energy, you are being asked how much it changes. You don't need the value of ##v## to perform that calculation.
please explain in detail why i used 440?
You are being asked to calculate the work done against the resistive force. What is that resistive force?
and part d)...
The work being done against the resistive force is not the only work that has to be done to get the car up the slope. Find the work that you haven't counted, include it, see what you get.
 
so for the first one
change in KE =0

resistive force is 440 so thats why we use it

and for part d
the total energy would be
gpe + the work done against resistive force
so 48000+440*25 / 17000
so time = 3.47 which is almost equal to 3.5
please tell me if im wrong
and thank you so much for your answer
 
Seems about right.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top