Change in Velocity: Find Solution and Reasoning

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the change in velocity between two vectors, Va and Vb, with specific magnitudes and directions. Two methods are proposed for calculating the change in velocity: direct subtraction of the vectors and adding the negative of Va to Vb. The first method yields a result of (3.5, 16.8*), while the second method results in (6.5, 59*). The user expresses uncertainty about the validity of both methods, particularly regarding the directionality of the vectors when reversing Va. Ultimately, the second method is favored based on a drawn vector diagram, although confidence in the graphical approach is noted as lacking.
yowatup
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am required to find the change in velocity given these two vectors:

Va = 4.4 m/s [E31*S]
Vb = 7.8 m/s [E25*N]

Homework Equations



delta V = Vb - Va
delta V = Vb + (-Va)

The Attempt at a Solution



I am stuck between two solutions:

#1. Simply subtracting the vectors:

V = Vb - Va
V = (7.8, 25*) - (4.4, 31*)
V = [7.1, 3.3] - [3.8, 2.3]
V = [3.3, 1.0]
V = (3.5, 16.8*)

#2. Reversing the direction of Va, its directionality becomes [W31*N], effectively 149*.

V = Vb + (-Va)
V = (7.8, 25*) + (4.4, 149*)
V = [7.1, 3.3] + [-3.8, 2.3]
V = (6.5, 59*)

Which solution is correct and why? The first would solution would be the same if you distributed -1 across to both terms, but I'm pretty sure that operation is not permitted.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Doesn't taking the negative vector mean that the -31 is really 149 + 180 = 329
 
I don't think so, as can be seen here:
http://i543.photobucket.com/albums/gg464/yowatupguystill/vector-1.jpg

EDIT: I might have been correct on my first attempt, but I had assumed that this was correct: https://www.physicsforums.com/archive/index.php/t-275728.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What is shown in your drawing is 329° and you are reversing it to 149° .
 
Yes. Is that not correct, given that we are reversing the direction?

Secondly, I have just drawn out a vector diagram to scale of the vectors in question. It seems to support #2, though I'm not sure how certain to be - given that I haven't work graphically with vectors in a while.
 
I believe Method 2 is the right way - the sum of the vector and the negative of a vector to do a vector subtraction..
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top