How Does a Skier's Energy Change Through Different Stages?

  • Thread starter Thread starter katj
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Change Energy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the energy changes a skier experiences during different stages of skiing. In Stage 1, work done by the chairlift is positive as the force is in the same direction as displacement. Stage 2 sees the skier at the mountaintop, possessing positive potential energy. In Stage 3, the skier has positive kinetic energy at the bottom of the slope. Stage 4 involves negative work done as friction opposes the skier's motion, leading to a stop. Understanding these energy transitions clarifies the skier's energy dynamics throughout the skiing experience.
katj
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
"A skier (total mass, ski included) catches a ride on a life to the top of a mountain (Stage 1 to stage 2). Once at the top, the skier heads down the slope, reaches the base of the mountain (Stage 3), and coasts to a stop (Stage 4).

Stage 1: Work done on the skier by the chairlift.
Stage 2: Potential Energy of the skier at the mountaintop.
Stage 3: Kinetic energy of the skier at the bottom of the mountain.
Stage 4: Work done on the skier to come to a stop.

Us this scenario to describe the signs (positive or negative) of the energy in each of these stages of the scenario.

A. Positive, Positive, Positive, Positive
B. Positive, Positive, Positive, and Negative
C. Positive, Positive, Negative, Positive
D. Negative, Positive, Positive, Negative
E. Negative, Positive, Positive, Positive

I am thinking that the answer should E, but I am not sure. It takes energy to do work, so stages 1 and 4 would be negative (I guess?). Stages 2 and 3 describe energy that the skier HAS, so they would be positive. I think!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
katj said:
It takes energy to do work, so stages 1 and 4 would be negative (I guess?).
I don't understand your reasoning here. Hint: If the energy has increased, the work done was positive.
Stages 2 and 3 describe energy that the skier HAS, so they would be positive.
Makes sense.
 
welcome to pf!

hi katj! welcome to pf! :smile:

work done is force times displacement (technically, force "dot" the displacement of the point of application of the force), so it'll be positive if the force is in the same direction as the displacement, and negative if it's in the opposite direction :wink:

and potential energy is defined as minus the work done (by a conservative force, such as gravity)

does that help? :smile:
 
Let me try again! Does this make more sense?

Stage 1- positive because the force is in the same direction as displacement
Stage 2- positive because the skier would have lots of potential energy at the top
Stage 3- positive because the skier would have lots of kinetic energy at the bottom
Stage 4- negative because the displacement is forward and the force (of friction) is going back

PS- Thanks for the help!
 
Good!
 
Yay! Thanks for all of the help! This makes sense now!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top