htg said:
I hope you are right. By the way, what happens to phase during total internal reflection when we have a thick enough layer of dielectric?
As I recall, the reflection coefficient is +1 for total internal reflection at a dielectric to dielectric interface at the critical angle. But of course there is a 180 degree phase shift for one of the components (the magnetic field I think) due to the change in the direction. Beyond the critical angle, the reflection coefficient becomes complex and you introduce a phase shift to both components I believe.
But yeah, having a thin layer of dielectric on the copper is not going to do anything. The resulting reflection coefficient is
[tex]R = \frac{R_{12}+R_{23}e^{2ik_zd}}{1+R_{12}R_{23}e^{2ik_zd}}[/tex]
For a thin dielectric the exponential is approximately 1 and R_{23} = -1 for a PEC and thus the total reflection coefficient is approximately -1. So no real difference.
We can also recast it as
[tex]R = R_{12} + \frac{T_{12}R_{23}T_{21}e^{2ik_zd}}{1-R_{21}R_{23}e^{2ik_zd}}[/tex]
If we have total internal reflection, then R_{21} = 1, T_{21} = 2 and as before R_{23} = -1. Thus,
[tex]R = R_{12} - T_{12} = -1[/tex]
We can easily calculate this exactly for a water interface of 1 mm over copper with an incident angle of 45 degrees. The total reflection coefficient is -1 - 2.40081795943819e-009i.