Change of Variables and Chain Rule

Stalker_VT
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am trying to solve the transport PDE using a change of variables and the chain rule, and my problem seems to be with the chain rule. The PDE is:

\frac{\partial u}{\partial t}+c\frac{\partial u}{\partial x} = 0 ......(1)

The change of variables (change of reference frame) is:

\xi = x - ct......(2)

From this we know that

u(t,x) = v(t, x - ct) = v(t, \xi)......(3)

The Attempt at a Solution



Taking the total derivative of both sides of (3)

\frac{d}{dt} [u(t,x) = v(t,\xi)]

using chain rule yields

\frac{\partial u}{\partial t} = \frac{\partial v}{\partial t} - c\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}......(4)

I think the next step is to PROVE that

\frac{\partial u}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial v}{\partial \xi}.....(5)

and then substitute (4) into (5) to get

\frac{\partial v}{\partial t} = 0

but i am not sure how to do this...Any help Greatly Appreciated

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Stalker_VT said:
and then substitute (4) into (5) to get

\frac{\partial v}{\partial t} = 0

but i am not sure how to do this...Any help Greatly Appreciated

Thanks!

If I understand correctly, I think you are basically done. You have $$
\frac{\partial v(t,\xi)}{\partial t}=0$$Take the anti-partial derivative of this with respect to t. Here your constant of integration is an arbitrary function of the other variable:$$
v(t,\xi) = f(\xi) = f(x-ct)$$so you have$$
u(x,t)=v(t,\xi)=f(\xi)=f(x-ct)$$Unless, of course, you already understood that and I misunderstand what your question is.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top