Changing bounds of integration.

Kuma
Messages
129
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The problem given:

niQjZ.png


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I need an x^2 in there to do the inner integral. I'm having a bit of trouble figuring out how the bounds are defined. X goes from 1 to y/2 and y goes from 0 to 2. So does that mean x goes from 1 to 2x?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Draw a sketch of the region you're integrating over in the xy plane.
 
I did that but I'm unsure if its right.

It should just look like a triangle from my drawing. Y going from 0 to 2 and x going from 2x to 1

So then the changed order should be

y going from 0 to 2x and x going from 0 to 1?
 
Kuma said:
I did that but I'm unsure if its right.

It should just look like a triangle from my drawing. Y going from 0 to 2 and x going from 2x to 1
Yes, but you're saying it in kind of a confusing way. When you say "x going from 2x to 1," you're using "x" to mean two different things. It would be better to say x goes from y/2 to 1.

So then the changed order should be

y going from 0 to 2x and x going from 0 to 1?
Yes, that's right. The triangle is bounded on two sides by the x-axis and the line x=1. The third side is the line y=2x or, equivalently, x=y/2. The first form is useful when you integrate with respect to y first; the second form is useful when you integrate with respect to x first.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top