I Changing the effective mass of an electron using electric potentials?

jcap
Messages
166
Reaction score
12
The Dirac equation for an electron in the presence of an electromagnetic 4-potential ##A_\mu##, where ##\hbar=c=1##, is given by
$$\gamma^\mu\big(i\partial_\mu-eA_\mu\big)\psi-m_e\psi=0.\tag{1}$$
I assume the Weyl basis so that
$$\psi=\begin{pmatrix}\psi_L\\\psi_R\end{pmatrix}\hbox{ and }\gamma_0=\begin{pmatrix}0&I\\I&0\end{pmatrix}.\tag{2}$$
I assume that the electron is stationary so that
$${\bf\hat{p}}\psi=-i\nabla\psi=(0,0,0).\tag{3}$$
Finally I assume that an electric potential ##\phi_{E}## exists so that we have
$$A_\mu=(-\phi_{E},0,0,0).\tag{4}$$
Substituting into the Dirac equation ##(1)## we find
$$i\begin{pmatrix}0&I\\I&0\end{pmatrix}\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\begin{pmatrix}\psi_L\\\psi_R\end{pmatrix}+e\ \phi_E\begin{pmatrix}0&I\\I&0\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}\psi_L\\\psi_R\end{pmatrix}-m_e\begin{pmatrix}\psi_L\\\psi_R\end{pmatrix}=0.\tag{5}$$
Writing out the two equations for ##\phi_L## and ##\phi_R##, contained in Eqn ##(5)##, explicitly we obtain
$$\begin{eqnarray*}
i\frac{\partial\psi_R}{\partial t} &=& m_e\ \psi_L - e\ \phi_E\ \psi_R\tag{6}\\
i\frac{\partial\psi_L}{\partial t} &=& -e\ \phi_E\ \psi_L + m_e\ \psi_R.\tag{7}
\end{eqnarray*}$$
Adding and subtracting Eqns. ##(6)## and ##(7)## we obtain
$$\begin{eqnarray*}
i\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\big(\psi_L+\psi_R\big) &=& \big(m_e\ - e\ \phi_E\big)\big(\psi_L+\psi_R\big)\tag{8}\\
i\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\big(\psi_L-\psi_R\big) &=& \big(-m_e\ - e\ \phi_E\big)\big(\psi_L-\psi_R\big).\tag{9}
\end{eqnarray*}$$
It seems to me that Eqn. ##(8)## describes an electron with an effective rest mass/energy ##M_e=m_e-e\phi_E## and Eqn. ##(9)## describes a positron with an effective rest mass/energy ##M_p=m_e+e\phi_E##.

If we can change the effective mass of electrons/positrons by changing the electric potential ##\phi_E## then can we change the dynamics of electrons in atoms by applying a large ##\phi_E\sim m_e/e##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
johne1618 asked same question 9 years ago :)

https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...-increased-by-electrostatic-potential.562505/

https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...on-increased-by-electromagnetic-field.562314/

Define ##\psi_+=\psi_L+\psi_R##, ##\psi_-=\psi_L-\psi_R## and ##f=e\phi_E##

Redefine ##\chi_+=e^{-ift}\psi_+## and ##\chi_-=e^{-ift}\psi_-##

The electrostatic potential drops out to leave the standard equations for the electron/positron rest mass energy ##m_e##:
$$i\frac{\partial\chi_+}{\partial t}=m_e\chi_+$$
$$i\frac{\partial\chi_-}{\partial t}=-m_e\chi_-$$
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top