Changing the limits on Integrals

  • Thread starter Thread starter kLPantera
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrals Limits
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the necessity of changing the limits of integration when performing u-substitution in definite integrals. Specifically, the first example, ∫(3/(x+1)dx) from a=1 to b=5, does not require limit changes, while the second example, ∫(6x^2/sqrt((x^3)-1)dx) from a=0 to b=2, necessitates changing the limits due to the substitution u=sqrt((x^3)-1). Participants clarify that when substituting, the limits must be adjusted to reflect the new variable of integration, u, evaluated at the original limits a and b.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of definite integrals and their limits
  • Knowledge of u-substitution in calculus
  • Familiarity with improper integrals and discontinuities
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the process of changing limits in u-substitution with various examples
  • Explore improper integrals and their evaluation techniques
  • Learn about the continuity of functions and its impact on integration
  • Practice solving definite integrals using different substitution methods
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, particularly those focusing on integration techniques, as well as anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of definite integrals and u-substitution.

kLPantera
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
I'm confused as to when to change the limits on a definite integral.

Ex. Integral with the limits a=1, b=5, 3/(x+1)dx

I set u = x+1 and du = dx

I used u-substitution and everything worked out fine.

However for this one...

Ex. Integral with the limits a = 0, b = 2, 6x^2/sqrt((x^3)-1)

I used u-substitution u = sqrt((x^3)-1) and so 2du = (6x^2)dx
However the book says I need to change the limits of the integral.

So I'm not sure when to change the limits of an integral. Can anyone help? Thanks =D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the first integral, did you change the integration limits to [2, 6]?

For the second one, of course you must change the limits of the integral when you make a substitution, but also note that this is an improper integral since the integrand is discontinuous somewhere on [0, 2].
 
For the first integral no I did not.
 
Hi kLPantera! :smile:

You're integrating with respect to x from a to b.
When you substitute u=u(x) you change the expression to read "du" instead of "dx".
This means that exactly from this moment on you're integrating with respect to u.
The limits for u=u(x) are then u(a) and u(b).
 
Ah I understand it now lol
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K