Characteristic Spectrum and the K-alpha line

Baddum12
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
I have just finished a junior-level lab assignment in which we used X-ray diffraction to determine the lattice constants of unknown materials. In the theory section of the lab write-up, it briefly explains the K-alpha doublet of the characteristic spectrum. I understand that it is the result of a vacancy in the K shell being filled from the L shell, and I understand that the two lines (Kα1 and Kα2) can appear as a single, unresolved line which is taken as the weighted average of the two lines. What I don't understand is why the Kα1 line is always twice as strong as the Kα2 line. I have read through the section on the characteristic spectrum in {Cullity, B.D. Elements of X-Ray Diffraction. 3ed. Prentice Hall, 2001} and I am still a little confused. Is this just an experimentally observed fact?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Baddum12 said:
I have just finished a junior-level lab assignment in which we used X-ray diffraction to determine the lattice constants of unknown materials. In the theory section of the lab write-up, it briefly explains the K-alpha doublet of the characteristic spectrum. I understand that it is the result of a vacancy in the K shell being filled from the L shell, and I understand that the two lines (Kα1 and Kα2) can appear as a single, unresolved line which is taken as the weighted average of the two lines. What I don't understand is why the Kα1 line is always twice as strong as the Kα2 line. I have read through the section on the characteristic spectrum in {Cullity, B.D. Elements of X-Ray Diffraction. 3ed. Prentice Hall, 2001} and I am still a little confused. Is this just an experimentally observed fact?
For Kα1 the total angular momentum of the initial state is 3/2, this has states with Jz components of 3/2,1/2,-1/2,-3/2. In comparison the inital states for kα2 emission have a total angular momentum of 1/2 which has Jz values of 1/2,-1/2. Thus there are twice as many states which for the electron to decay to by emitting Kα1 than Kα2.
 
  • Like
Likes Baddum12
Vagn said:
For Kα1 the total angular momentum of the initial state is 3/2, this has states with Jz components of 3/2,1/2,-1/2,-3/2. In comparison the inital states for kα2 emission have a total angular momentum of 1/2 which has Jz values of 1/2,-1/2. Thus there are twice as many states which for the electron to decay to by emitting Kα1 than Kα2.
Thanks a lot, Vagn, that is actually pretty straight-forward. Cheers!
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top