Charge above and infinite grounded plane

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
The classic image problem is this: Suppose we have a charge q over an infinite grounded plane. What will be the potential at a given point for z>0. It's not just the potential of the charge q since it will induce a certain charge on the conductor.
By looking at the mirror problem of a charges of opposite sign and displaced the same length relative to z=0 but in different directions, one finds from the uniqueness theorem that this solution also holds for the problem above.
Now: According to my book, even though the fields will the same, then the electrostatic energy of the charge is different in the two problems.
In the problem with the conductor the energy is namely only half the energy of the image problem. I have some trouble understanding this. The electrostatic energy is negative because we have to do work to separate the system in both cases. In the first case a negative charge and positive charge are brought in. In the second case a charge q is brought in while the induced charge runs into sustain a zero potential in the conductor. But why would separation require half the energy?
In the first case you would need to pull away the positive charge away while keeping the negative fixed. In the conductor case, what would then happen?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aaaa202 said:
The classic image problem is this: Suppose we have a charge q over an infinite grounded plane. What will be the potential at a given point for z>0. It's not just the potential of the charge q since it will induce a certain charge on the conductor.
By looking at the mirror problem of a charges of opposite sign and displaced the same length relative to z=0 but in different directions, one finds from the uniqueness theorem that this solution also holds for the problem above.
Now: According to my book, even though the fields will the same, then the electrostatic energy of the charge is different in the two problems.
In the problem with the conductor the energy is namely only half the energy of the image problem. I have some trouble understanding this. The electrostatic energy is negative because we have to do work to separate the system in both cases. In the first case a negative charge and positive charge are brought in. In the second case a charge q is brought in while the induced charge runs into sustain a zero potential in the conductor. But why would separation require half the energy?
In the first case you would need to pull away the positive charge away while keeping the negative fixed. In the conductor case, what would then happen?

This easiest way to see this is to look at the expression for electrostatic energy in term of the electric field W=\frac{\epsilon_0}{2}\int_{\text{all space}} E^2 d^3 x

The fields for z\geq0 are the same for both cases, but what about for z<0?
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top