Charge collection principles for gaseous detectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter abotiz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Detectors
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the charge collection principles in gaseous detectors, specifically ion chambers, proportional counters, and GM tubes. It highlights that in ion chambers, both electrons and positive ions contribute to current, but pulse mode primarily measures electrons for energy deposition accuracy. In proportional counters, most charge carriers are generated near the anode, with positive ions contributing significantly due to their mass. GM tubes can measure total current from both types of charge carriers, although the exact value is less critical. Additionally, it is possible to selectively measure currents from either electrons or positive ions through careful circuit design.
abotiz
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am reading the great Knoll book about radiation detection and measurement, and I don't fully understand the difference in charge collection for gaseous detectors. Is it the collection of electrons or positive ions in the detectors, a) Ion chamber, b) Proportional counters, c) GM tubes

This is what I do know,

1) When charged particles are subjected to an electric field, they move to the respective electrodes. This motion constitutes to a current which you measure. Electrons move faster then ions, however, positive ions motion contributes to a higher current (due to their mass?)

This is what I think is true,

2) Ion chambers, in current mode you collect both (electrons and positive ions) because the production of ion pairs reaches an equilibrium. In pulse mode you want to approximate the current measured to the energy depostited, so you want a fast counting system, therefore you only measure the current from the electrons.

3) In Proportional counters, almost all charge carriers (positive ions and electrons) are created near the anode, and the largest contribution to the puls is the drift of the positive ions due to their larger mass??

4) In GM tubes, Iam not sure, do you measure the total current created from both electrons and positive ions from the entire tube?

Another question I have is, how do you ONLY measure the current from positive ions and not electrons, vice versa ? Current, viewed from Ohms law does not separate electrons and positive ions. When Knoll says e.g. the signal measured is mostly due to the drift of the positive ions, is this because the integration time of the circuit is chosen in such way which makes the statement true?

Thank you very much!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
positive ions motion contributes to a higher current (due to their mass?)
The amount of charge from the initial track is the same for both, as the initial gas is neutral. I would not expect a different current, unless you use charge amplification at the electrodes (but then it depends on the geometry).

3) In Proportional counters, almost all charge carriers (positive ions and electrons) are created near the anode, and the largest contribution to the puls is the drift of the positive ions due to their larger mass??
The anode gets significant current peaks when the electrons hit it.

4) In GM tubes, Iam not sure, do you measure the total current created from both electrons and positive ions from the entire tube?
You can measure the total current, but the precise value does not matter anyway.

Another question I have is, how do you ONLY measure the current from positive ions and not electrons, vice versa ?
With a careful choice of capacitances, you can separate them.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Back
Top