I Charge conjugation and spatial wave function

Josh1079
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm recently reading something which briefly introduces C symmetry. So the thing that confuses me is that how does the spatial wave function contribute the (-1)^L factor?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Josh1079 said:
Hi,

I'm recently reading something which briefly introduces C symmetry. So the thing that confuses me is that how does the spatial wave function contribute the (-1)^L factor?

Thanks!

It would be beneficial to point to your reference.

But I would imagine you're referring to a particle-anti particle pair after a C symmetry transformation. The (-1)^{L} factor comes from exchanging the particle coordinates in the spatial wave function after applying the C operator to return the state to its previous appearance. The parity of the spatial wave functions under that exchange is (-1)^{L}.
 
Suppose you have a particle A and an antiparticle \bar{A}... the system of two together is an eigenstate of the charge conjugation operator C... that is because:
C |A \bar{A}> = |\bar{A} A> =^{(?)} \lambda_C |A \bar{A}>
See the questionmark... again a reminder: a state |a> is an eigenstate of an operator O with eigenvalue c_a if the following equation holds: O |a> = c_a |a>.

Now again you asked where does the (-1)^L comes from. Well, L is the angular momentum of the system... This becomes obvious if you drew the particle-antiparticle pair, but on maths it becomes obvious if you assign to them their position x_{A}, \bar{x}_A for the particle and antiparticle respectively.
C |A (x_A) \bar{A}(\bar{x}_A)> = |\bar{A}(x_A) A(\bar{x}_A)> = (-1)^L |A(x_A) \bar{A}(\bar{x}_A)>
Since the middle step of the above equation is the parity applied on A which was on x_A and Abar which was on barx_A (got the positions exchanged)
(that's what happens in the spatial-coord space)
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top