Charge Invariant: Intuitive Reason?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Swapnil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Invariant
Swapnil
Messages
459
Reaction score
6
Why is charge an invariant quantity? My professor once said that that is an experimental fact. I believe him. But is there an "intuitive" reason for why a charge should be an invariant quanity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Swapnil said:
Why is charge an invariant quantity? My professor once said that that is an experimental fact. I believe him. But is there an "intuitive" reason for why a charge should be an invariant quanity?
No, there is no intuitive reason that I know of. The conservation of charge is simply taken to be an axiom in physics.

Pete
 
I dislike that wording. There are no "axioms" in physics. There is only "experimental evidence".
 
Swapnil said:
Why is charge an invariant quantity? My professor once said that that is an experimental fact. I believe him. But is there an "intuitive" reason for why a charge should be an invariant quanity?
"invariant" here could be ambiguous. If you mean "conserved", that is an experimental question with overwhelming experimental verification.
More likely, it means invariant with respect to a Lorentz transformation. This can be proven mathematiclly, starting with the continuity equation
(which follows from charge conservtion).
The proof is a bit tricky.
 
HallsofIvy said:
I dislike that wording. There are no "axioms" in physics. There is only "experimental evidence".

There have been many axioms or assumptions (educated guesses in physics). For instance, Ben Franklin and his GUESS that it was positive charge that was free flowing in the wire. Positive charges DO flow in the direction opposite the electrons, but Franklin believed it was the positive charges in the wire that were the physical objects moving, which is the opposite of what we know now.

Also, the idea that the speed of light was constant was in fact an axiom (Einstein calls it a POSTULATE) in his original paper. There was no experimental evidence for this. Just as Newton assumed all of his laws are the same in all inertial frames, Einstein assumed ALL laws of physics, beyond Newton's, were the same.
 
Last edited:

Thread 'A sufficient condition for integrability of equation ##\nabla g=0##'

In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
View full post »

Thread 'Hawking After 54 Years Confirmed: BH surfaces don't shrink'

Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
View full post »
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'

Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'

See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Why Is the Invariant Interval True for All Values of s?
Replies
14
Views
1K
I What, exactly, are invariants?
3
Replies
144
Views
10K
I Series Expansion of the Infinitesimal Spacetime Interval
Replies
22
Views
3K
I Explore Spacetimes, Metrics & Symmetries in Relativity Theory
Replies
7
Views
2K
A Gauge Invariance of Transverse Traceless Perturbation in Linearized Gravity
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Why is energy not Lorentz invariant?
Replies
31
Views
9K
A Lorentz Invariance of Lagrangian: Proof & Explanation
Replies
4
Views
2K
A GW Binary Merger: Riemann Tensor in Source & TT-Gauge
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Lorentz Invariance of Q in Weinberg: Justifying Transformation
Replies
9
Views
2K
A Difference Between Covariance and Diffeomorphism Invarience
Replies
11
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top