Charge on Conventional Alum Foil

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ronnin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the maximum electric charge that can be applied to household aluminum foil without causing ignition. Participants clarify that the question likely pertains to current (amperes) rather than charge (coulombs), emphasizing the importance of the foil's cross-sectional area in determining current flow. They highlight that the heating effect is related to Joule heating, which occurs when electrons move through a conductor, generating heat proportional to the current squared and the resistance. The conversation also touches on the variables affecting aluminum's melting point and resistance, which are crucial for understanding the potential fire hazards. Overall, the need for careful consideration of these factors before conducting experiments is stressed.
Ronnin
Messages
168
Reaction score
1
Does anyone happen to know the maximum electric charge that can be applied to ordinary household alum foil before overheating to ignition?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry but your question does not make sense. Do you mean current, in amperes? Because merely holding a net charge, in coulombs, does not heat up anything.

If you are talking current, then you will need to specify how narrow the piece of foil is. The crucial matter is the cross-sectional area through which the current will flow.
 
Yes, known maximum amps would be fine. Even in C there must be a threshold to which maximum (combustion in this case) thermal energy is achieved.
 
I thought Chi gave a good post. for piling up charges, let's take an absurd example, and assume that we have an aluminum sphere in the vacuum of space and with no nearby electrical fields. Imagine the charge fairy could pluck electrons from atoms far removed and gently deposit them on the aluminums surface. By what mechanism do you imagine that the aluminum would heat. I have no point of view, just wondering what yours might be?

OTOH, movement of electrons in a confined material of arbitrary volume implies heat. They bang around to such an extent that we have both microscopic and macroscopic versions of Joule heating. Bad if you're tying to make a supercomputer the size of a bread box, good if you're arc welding.

To try to formalize problem, consider a situation where to get from point a to point b involves traversing a thin patch of aluminum. You might even call this an electrical fuse. Its not as simple as I suspect the following notions would point to:

For aluminum you have the following properties to consider--at what temp does it melt, what resistance does it offer to electrical passage, and how nuch heat energy is required to heat a gram a single degree. As current moves, it heats in relation I^2*R where I is in amps and R is resitance. Now like pipes for water, a very thin strand of aluminum will have the greatest R. Since it has little mass, it takes very little heat to gain temperature fast.

Etc, etc, Point is is you want to know how much current is required to melt or even blow a hole thru aluminum as in vaporize, depends on a lot of variables.
 
Thank you guys so much for the replies. I will do some figuring. I just didn't want to attempt an experiment without knowing the fire hazard.
 
Good idea! I've done some inadvertent arc welding :redface: while using the caps for strobe circuit in throw away camera!
 
Ronnin said:
Even in C there must be a threshold to which maximum (combustion in this case) thermal energy is achieved.

You will be the first to find out. Keep us posted.
 
Back
Top