Charge staggered over spherical volume.

cdummie
Messages
147
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


There is charge placed in a volume of a sphere, whose density changes by expression ρ(r)=ρ0a/r for 0<r≤a and ρ(0)=0. Where a and ρ0 are known variables , and r is a distance from the origin. Determine the potential of the point A(0,0,0) with regard to reference point at infinity.

Homework Equations


Gaussian law.

The Attempt at a Solution


I solved it this way:

I separated potential into two parts like this:
формула за потенцијал у задатку.png

since there is different expression for changing of electric field at arbitrary point whose distance from origin is less than a, than for those whose distance is greater than a.

For finding E i used Gaussian law,
and this is what i got for E1:

лијева страна.png

десна страна.png
прво поље.png


Doing the same thing for the r greater than a, i got expression for E2 (difference is that i had different limits of integration when finding charge , it was from 0 to a instead of r since i took all of the charge there is):
друго поље.png

Placing it into first expression i got:

укупни потенцијал.png


Now my question is, is this correct, i mean is this correct approach for finding potential in examples like this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Everything looks good!
 
  • Like
Likes cdummie
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top