Charged conductor in electrostatic equilibrium

AI Thread Summary
In electrostatic equilibrium, charges in a conductor redistribute to eliminate electric fields, causing positive charges to reside on the outer surface of a positively charged spherical shell. When a positively charged particle is placed inside the shell, negative charges from the shell's surface gather on the inner lining, resulting in an equal amount of positive charge on the outer surface. The remaining positive charge does not move towards the inner side due to the attraction of negative charges; instead, it remains on the outer surface because of repulsion among like charges. The electric field generated by the inner charge influences the distribution of charges, leading to a non-zero electric field in the void but none within the metal. This dynamic illustrates the principles of charge distribution in conductors under electrostatic conditions.
yoyo311
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have read that in electrostatic equilibrium, their are no electric fields or else the charges would be moving. So given a positively charged spherical shell, the positive charges would repel each other and reside on the outside, causing the shell to be in electrostatic equilibrium.

But if we now put a positively charged particle in the inside the shell, some negative charges from the shell would gather on the inner lining of the shell thus making a same amount of positively charged particles reside on the outermost part of the shell.

What about the remaining initial positive charge? Does it reside on the outermost lining of the shell because the charges repel each other (ie. charges in a conductor gather as far away from each other on the lining of the conductor), or are they attracted towards the inner side of the shell because the negative charges already there attract them and the positive charges already on the outside repel them?

I hope my question makes sense. This is not exactly a "homework problem", but a question arising from a problem.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi yoyo311, welcome to PF!

yoyo311 said:
I have read that in electrostatic equilibrium, their are no electric fields or else the charges would be moving. So given a positively charged spherical shell, the positive charges would repel each other and reside on the outside, causing the shell to be in electrostatic equilibrium.

You meant a metal shell. There is no electric field in the metal.

yoyo311 said:
But if we now put a positively charged particle in the inside the shell, some negative charges from the shell would gather on the inner lining of the shell thus making a same amount of positively charged particles reside on the outermost part of the shell.

What about the remaining initial positive charge? Does it reside on the outermost lining of the shell because the charges repel each other (ie. charges in a conductor gather as far away from each other on the lining of the conductor), or are they attracted towards the inner side of the shell because the negative charges already there attract them and the positive charges already on the outside repel them?

Do not forget that the electrons can move in a metal, the positive charge is associated to the stationary metal ions.

Putting a positively charged particle inside the void, it generates electric field there. There is non-zero electric field at the inner wall of the shell, and that field attracts the electrons of the metal to the surface. Those electrons are missing inside the metal, and their place is filled with other electrons, producing positively charged regions farther outward, till this positive charge gathers at the outward surface of the shell, adding to the positive charge already there.

The electric field lines in the void connect the positive particle and the electrons on the inner surface. In stationary state, there is no electric field inside the metal. The positive charge on the surface does not "feel " the negative charge on the inner surface.

ehild
 
yoyo311 said:
I have read that in electrostatic equilibrium, their are no electric fields or else the charges would be moving. So given a positively charged spherical shell, the positive charges would repel each other and reside on the outside, causing the shell to be in electrostatic equilibrium.

But if we now put a positively charged particle in the inside the shell, some negative charges from the shell would gather on the inner lining of the shell thus making a same amount of positively charged particles reside on the outermost part of the shell.

What about the remaining initial positive charge? Does it reside on the outermost lining of the shell because the charges repel each other (ie. charges in a conductor gather as far away from each other on the lining of the conductor), or are they attracted towards the inner side of the shell because the negative charges already there attract them and the positive charges already on the outside repel them?

I hope my question makes sense. This is not exactly a "homework problem", but a question arising from a problem.

Use successively larger Gaussian surfaces to track the charge distribution on the inside and outside of your shell: ∫∫D*dA = Q.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top