Charged wire inside a linear dielectric

jennyjones
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



see attachment 2

Homework Equations



a.


The Attempt at a Solution



see atachment 1


i am stuck at problem a. the question is to write down the boundary conditions for that the E field has to satisfy infinetly far away from the wire and at the boundary of the dielectric z = 0.

I'm not sure how to do this, any help is welcome

thanks

Jenny
 

Attachments

  • Foto op 10-05-14 om 12.28.jpg
    Foto op 10-05-14 om 12.28.jpg
    31.6 KB · Views: 552
  • Schermafbeelding 2014-05-10 om 12.34.04.jpg
    Schermafbeelding 2014-05-10 om 12.34.04.jpg
    49.5 KB · Views: 595
Physics news on Phys.org
Dat mag niet. Groetjes B. N.
 
You have the following equations, valid everywhere
\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{E}=0, \quad \vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{D}=\rho, \quad \vec{D}=\epsilon \vec{E}.
In your case you have
\epsilon=\Theta(z)+\epsilon_{r} \Theta(-z).
To get the boundary conditions you just apply Stokes's theorem to the first equation with an arbitrary rectangular surface perpendicular to the surface. This leads to the condition that the tangential components of the electric field must be continuous across the surface, i.e., in your case
\vec{e}_z \times [\vec{E}(x,y,0^+)-\vec{E}(x,y,0^-)]=0,
because \vec{e}_z is the normal vector of the dielectric's boundary surface.

Further you use an infinitesimal cube parallel to the boundary on the 2nd equation. This yields the boundary condition
\vec{e}_z [\vec{D}(x,y,0^+)-\vec{D}(x,y,0^-)] = \sigma.
Here \sigma is the surface charge density on the surface of the dielectric.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top