Charging a parallel plate capacitor

AI Thread Summary
Charging a parallel plate capacitor involves connecting it to a power supply through a resistor, which influences the charging rate. Initially, the voltage across the capacitor is lower due to the resistor, but it approaches the source voltage over time, theoretically never fully reaching it. After several time constants, the capacitor is considered fully charged, typically around 99% of the source voltage. When the capacitor's capacitance is reduced without loss of charge, the potential difference across it can increase significantly. Understanding the relationship between current, voltage, and capacitance is crucial for grasping how capacitors charge in a circuit.
al_201314
Messages
116
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

I've been reading the forums and finally I have something to post :smile:

I've got a question regarding charging parallel plate capacitors. Take this for example:

Connect a 6 Volt power supply to a resistor of 2Mohm and in series with a 15uF capacitor initially uncharged, with a current of 0.0000018A flowing through.

A simple calculation would show that the P.D across the capacitor is 2.4V. The question then goes on to ask what is the new p.d across the capacitor when it is fully charged and reduced to 5uF without any loss of charges and the answer is 16.8V

I figured in order to get the answer the charges in the capacitor must be that of 6V x 15uF. My question is that how then would the capacitor gets charged up to the maximum of 6V (how would one know the max is 6V?) with the presence of the resistor?

I can't really grasp the concept here hope someone can help me out with the explanation and sorry for being so long winded can't find an easier way to put it across!

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
V(capacitor) = V(source, 6 volts in this instance)*(1-e^-(t/rc)).

Theoretically, the potential difference across the capacitor will never reach the source voltage, but after a very very long time, it will be close enough that you won't be able to measure the difference anyway.

In electronics, after five or so time constants (r*c) they call it good and say the capacitor is fully charged. Plugging in the numbers, at that time the capacitor is charged up to 99 percent of the source voltage. For this particular circuit the time required would be somewhat less than three minutes.

Leave it hooked up for a day, and the difference between the source voltage and that across the capacitor is something to the order of 10^-54 or so.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the reply Hammie... pardon me but could you elaborate on how the capacitor could charge up close to the source voltage when in this case there's a resistor in series leaving a p.d of only 2.4V across the capacitor?

Thanks!
 
al_201314 said:
Thanks for the reply Hammie... pardon me but could you elaborate on how the capacitor could charge up close to the source voltage when in this case there's a resistor in series leaving a p.d of only 2.4V across the capacitor?

Thanks!
The current through the resistor is maximum initially, when the capacitor is uncharged and the voltage across the resistor is maximum. The current decays exponentially as the voltage on the cap increases with a decaying exponential shape. The final current through the resistor after a long time is zero, and the voltage on the capacitor equals the source voltage.

Remember that the equation for the current into a capacitor that is charging is I = C dV/dt. The higher the current, the faster the capacitor charges. Solve this equation to see the exponential equation for the capacitor voltage versus time when charged through a series resistor.
 
Connect a 6 Volt power supply to a resistor of 2Mohm and in series with a 15uF capacitor initially uncharged, with a current of 0.0000018A flowing through.

You are correct, the voltage across the capacitor is 2.4 volts, but at a particular time. The voltage will approach six volts, at a much greater time than this.

The question then goes on:

The question then goes on to ask what is the new p.d across the capacitor WHEN IT IS FULLY CHARGED and reduced to 5uF without any loss of charges and the answer is 16.8V

before the capacitor is reduced to 5 uf, its potential difference is (or is as good as..) six volts, it is said to be fully charged.

This may be more than you want to know about charging capacitors, but look here..

http://www.ac.wwu.edu/~vawter/PhysicsNet/Topics/DC-Current/RCSeries.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the responses much appreciated!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top