Checking Field Axioms for $G = F \times F$

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axioms Field
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on determining whether the structure \( G = F \times F \) with defined operations of addition \( (a, b) + (c, d) = (a+c, b+d) \) and multiplication \( (a, b) \cdot (c, d) = (ac, bd) \) satisfies the field axioms. Participants emphasize the importance of checking associativity, identity elements, and the existence of inverses. The identity for addition is \( (0, 0) \), while the identity for multiplication requires further exploration, leading to the conclusion that \( G \) may not form a field due to potential zero-divisors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of field axioms
  • Familiarity with vector spaces
  • Knowledge of associativity in algebraic structures
  • Basic properties of zero-divisors in rings
NEXT STEPS
  • Investigate the properties of zero-divisors in \( F \times F \)
  • Explore the concept of identity elements in algebraic structures
  • Learn about the implications of associativity in field theory
  • Examine the conditions under which \( F \times F \) can be considered a vector space
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebra students, and anyone studying field theory or abstract algebra who seeks to understand the structure of products of fields.

Guest2
Messages
192
Reaction score
0
Problem: Let $F$ be a field and let $G = F \times F$. Define multiplication and addition on $G$ by setting $(a, b)+(c, d) = (a+c, b+d)$ and $(a, b) \cdot (c, d) = (ac, bd)$. Does this define a field structure on $$G$$?

I know field axioms but I'm unable to apply them to this problem. How do you check associativity for example?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Guest said:
Problem: Let $F$ be a field and let $G = F \times F$. Define multiplication and addition on $G$ by setting $(a, b)+(c, d) = (a+c, b+d)$ and $(a, b) \cdot (c, d) = (ac, bd)$. Does this define a field structure on $$G$$?

I know field axioms but I'm unable to apply them to this problem. How do you check associativity for example?
To check associativity (for multiplication – use a similar process for associativity of addition), start like this: $$\bigl((a, b) \cdot (c, d)\bigr) \cdot(e,f) = (ac,bd)\cdot (e,f) = \bigl((ac)e,(bd)f\bigr).$$ Then do a similar calculation for $(a,b)\cdot \bigl((c,d) \cdot(e,f)\bigr)$, and use associativity of $F$ to conclude that the two results are the same.

You might do better to start the problem by asking what are the zero and identity elements of $F\times F$. Does each element of $F\times F$ have a negative, and does each nonzero element have an inverse?
 
Thank you.

Opalg said:
You might do better to start the problem by asking what are the zero and identity elements of $F\times F$. Does each element of $F\times F$ have a negative, and does each nonzero element have an inverse?
I can't find suitable identity elements. I tried (0, 0) for addition and (1, 0) for multiplication but these don't work!
 
Guest said:
Thank you.

I can't find suitable identity elements. I tried (0, 0) for addition and (1, 0) for multiplication but these don't work!

Try $(0,0)$ again for addition:

$(a,b) + (0,0) = (a+0,b+0) =?$

This might help for multiplication: suppose our identity (if it exists) is $(x,y)$.

Since we must have: $(a,b)(x,y) = (a,b)$, we obtain:

$ax = a$
$by = b$.

Note we can re-write these as:

$a(x - 1) = 0$
$b(y - 1) = 0$. Use the field properties for $F$, now.

As to your larger question, as to whether or not $F \times F$ with the operations indicated is a field, I suggest you consider whether or not it has any zero-divisors.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
951
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
625
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
980
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
928
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K