Checking My Work: Solving for Applied Force in Friction Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the applied force needed to slide a 22kg mass up a 71-degree incline at constant velocity, with a coefficient of friction of 0.29. The initial calculations provided were incorrect, particularly in determining the frictional force, which should be calculated as the product of the coefficient of friction and the normal force. The correct approach identifies the normal force as balancing the perpendicular component of the weight, leading to a frictional force of approximately 20.3 N. The applied force must equal the sum of the gravitational force down the incline and the frictional force. Overall, the key takeaway is the importance of using the correct formulas for friction and forces in inclined plane problems.
mohlam12
Messages
153
Reaction score
0
hey everybody, i have an easy problem in friction, i just want to make sure if what i did is right; here is the problem:
A 22kg mass is slid up an incline of 71degree to the horizontal at constant velocity. If mu=.29, what is the applied force?

here is what i did:

Fgravity = 22*9.8*cos(71) = 70.19
Fparallel = 22.9.8*sin(71) = 203.85
Ffriction = 70.19/.26 = 269.96
Fapplied = 269.96+203.85 = 473.81 N

do u think that is right (not the calculations, but the formulas i used) ? :biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry. No.

What is it that you are calling "Fgravity"?

The force of gravity is "weight" which is "mg." The parallel component of weight that you have is correct, but the frictional force is wrong.

Friction is "mu" times the normal force. Here, the normal force balances the perpendicular compnent of the weight, so friction is
f = (0.29)(22kg)(9.8N/kg)cos71 = 20.3 N

since the velocity is constant, then the pushing force "up" the incline is balanced by the two forces "down" the incline. It appears that this part of the concept you have correct.
 
To second Chi Meson, the frictional force is mu times the normal force, not normal force divided by mu!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top