Checking Speed of EM Waves in Coaxial Lines with Pulse Function

AI Thread Summary
Using a pulse function in a function generator is preferred for measuring the speed of electromagnetic waves in coaxial lines due to the clarity of its sharp edges. Unlike sawtooth functions, which have slanted edges, pulse functions allow for precise timing comparisons since their edges occur at an exact moment. This eliminates ambiguity in determining which part of the signal to compare, enhancing measurement accuracy. The assumption of an ideal pulse without dispersion further supports this method. Overall, pulse functions provide a more reliable means of assessing wave speed in coaxial lines.
newton1
Messages
151
Reaction score
0
why we should use the pulse function in function generator when we need to check the speed of electromagnetic wave in coaxial line ??
why we can't use the other like sawtooth function??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is easier to compare the edges of pulse functions than to compare slanted edges. Assuming an ideal pulse, and no dispersion, the edges of the pulses will occur entirely at an exact instant in time. Using a signal with slanted edges, you would have to determine what part of the edge of the transmitted signal to compare to what part of the edge of the received signal.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top