Chem. Engineering Undergrad, Physics Grad Possibility

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the career paths available to a chemical engineering student considering a Master's in Physics. It highlights that pursuing a Master's in Physics typically requires completing a qualifying year to cover foundational physics courses not taken during undergraduate studies. While a Master's in Physics can open various career opportunities, a PhD is recommended for those interested in theoretical and research roles. The conversation emphasizes the importance of aligning graduate studies with career goals, particularly whether to remain in chemical engineering or transition to physics. Some participants suggest that if the intention is to work primarily as a chemical engineer, a physics degree may not provide significant advantages. The possibility of nuclear engineering is mentioned as a potential middle ground, combining elements of both fields. Ultimately, the discussion encourages making a clear decision based on personal interests and career aspirations.
jayeffarr
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am currently a junior in the chemical engineering program at my school and have now started debating possible paths I can take after I graduate. What I'm interested in are what type of possibilities are out there for engineers who choose to Master in Physics and not in their respective undergrad subject?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
if you choose to go to grad school for physics you will probably have to go through a qualifying year in which you would have to take a lot of the physics courses you didn't take in your undergrad. I am also a chemical engineer and the only required physics for me was 3 basic classes so I am assuming your curriculum is similar. I thought of doing the same thing at one point but decided on going to grad school for nuclear engineering rather than physics. although I will likely have to do the same qualifying year since most of the classes are different.

If you got a masters in physics it woud certainly open some doors into other careers, a Phd would be a lot better, especially if you are looking to get into theory and research. Are you still looking to work as a chemical engineer or want to get a job in the physics field after your masters?
 
Both fields of study fascinate me, though I may change my mind as time goes on. I would almost prefer to stay somewhere connected with chemical engineering since it would be my undergrad study.

At the same time I also yearn to doing research within physics.
I'm just not sure what way a Master's in Physics would lead me, as far as career choices with a chem.E. Bachelor's. Even a possible PhD in physics for the hell of it.
 
I'm not exactly sure how the physics degree would help you as a chem e. Perhaps someone with more experience in the physics field would be able to answer that for you. But if you want to do research within physics then obviously getting a graduate degree in physics is the way to go. I am also interested in both paths and decided nuclear engineering was kind of a middleground that involved a little of both fields. In my opinion, you should try make a definate decision on what you want to do. If you want to work solely as a chemical engineer I don't see the physics degree helping very much and getting a graduate degree in it might be a waste of time if you end up working as a chem e in the end. However, as I stated before, this could be wrong and someone with more knowledge of physics careers might be able to offer better advice. Maybe someone knows of another field, other than nuclear e, that you will have to utilize everything from both a physics and chem e degree.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top