CHEM: Triple point Temp and Pressure

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the temperature and pressure at the triple point of uranium hexafluoride using two equations for the natural logarithm of pressure for solid and liquid phases. The user initially attempts to solve for temperature using a pressure of 1 atm but struggles to relate the two equations correctly to find the triple point. A key point raised is the importance of determining whether the two equations intersect, as this intersection is crucial for identifying the triple point conditions. The user expresses uncertainty about the mathematical relationship needed to connect the equations effectively. Understanding the intersection of these equations is essential for accurately calculating the triple point.
ktmtalker
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I need to calculate the temperature and pressure at the triple point. natural log of pressure of the liquid/solid: lnp(solid)= 29.411-(5893.5K/T) lnp(liquid)=22.254-(3479.9K/T). The compound is uranium hexafluoride, MW= 352.02. I do not believe the actual molecule matters to much, just the weight. pressure is in Pa.








Homework Equations


lnp(solid)= 29.411-(5893.5K/T)
lnp(liquid)=22.254-(3479.9K/T)

The Attempt at a Solution


3. The Attempt at a Solution
I used P= 1 atm -->101.325kPa, and using the lnp(solid) equation determined a temperature. I then used that same temp in the lnp(liquid) to solve the other lnp equation. It did not go well. I am unsure on how to relate these two equations to the triple point. I should be able to grind through the math when I know how to relate it all.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ktmtalker said:
I used P= 1 atm -->101.325kPa, and using the lnp(solid) equation determined a temperature. I then used that same temp in the lnp(liquid) to solve the other lnp equation. It did not go well. I am unsure on how to relate these two equations to the triple point. I should be able to grind through the math when I know how to relate it all.
When one "assumes" one atmosphere, one makes a big mistake. You have two equations. Do they intersect? What is the relationship of that intersection to the triple-point?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top