Studying Chemistry Classes - Reading the Books

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, participants express concerns about the limited scope of a single-semester organic chemistry class, noting that it covers only a fraction of the material found in the textbook "Organic Chemistry" by John McMurray. The brevity of the course is highlighted as a reason for not covering extensive content, contrasting with experiences from previous decades when longer courses were common. There is an emphasis on the importance of aligning study materials with the syllabus to avoid wasting time on topics not included in the curriculum. While some advocate for focusing solely on course content to maximize grades, others argue that understanding additional concepts can enhance overall learning and retention. The consensus acknowledges that textbooks often contain more material than can be covered in a single course due to varying instructor preferences and course structures.
cnidocyte
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
I'm reading the book (Organic Chemistry by John McMurray) for my organic chemistry class at the moment and when I looked at the past exam papers and course structure I noticed it doesn't cover a lot of what I've read so far. My course only seems to cover a handful of chapters in the book. Its a single semester class. Are classes always like this as in they only cover a handful of chapters in the book?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One semester organic class is awfully short, no wonder it doesn't cover too much. Back in eighties I have attended three semesters course. Organic chemistry is wast.
 
A semester in my college is half the year.
 
Are classes always like this as in they only cover a handful of chapters in the book?

Yes -- in my experience.

You should always coordinate your readings with the class syllabus, so you don't "waste time".
 
General_Sax said:
Yes -- in my experience.

You should always coordinate your readings with the class syllabus, so you don't "waste time".

There no such thing as wasting time when you're learning chemistry. I learn concepts so that I know them forever, not to pass my chemistry course. Besides a lot of the extra currular stuff I learn helps me understand the stuff I do in college better. Takes revision and putting the theory into practice to make the memories permanent though.
 
Textbooks almost always include more material than can reasonably be covered in a single course (or multiple-course sequence that the book is targeted for). This is because different courses and instructors cover somewhat different sets of topics, and publishers want to maximize sales by appealing to as many instructors as possible.

In physics, I don't remember ever taking or teaching a course in which the entire textbook was covered. (This covers a span of about forty years.)
 
Well, if you've enough time to self-study topics that aren't covered in your course, then your method works just fine.

Personally, I try to maximize my grades, so I don't study concepts that aren't covered in my courses.
 
General_Sax said:
Well, if you've enough time to self-study topics that aren't covered in your course, then your method works just fine.

Personally, I try to maximize my grades, so I don't study concepts that aren't covered in my courses.

Good point, I often spend loads of time learning extra curricular topics and when I do the test I don't do that well because it doesn't include half the stuff I learned. Maybe its best to concentrate on what the course covers.
 
cnidocyte said:
A semester in my college is half the year.

And the three semester course I have mentioned lasted a year and the half. There were several two semester courses (like GenChem, PhysChem, Analytical), but only one longer.
 
Back
Top