[Chemistry]Composition of elements in empirical formula

  • Thread starter Thread starter chomool
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elements Formula
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the empirical formula of a compound based on given masses of carbon dioxide, water, and silver bromide. The empirical formula C6H5Br is derived by focusing on carbon, hydrogen, and bromine while excluding silver. This exclusion is due to the assumption that silver nitrate is used to identify halogens and that oxygen is not present in the compound. Participants clarify that there are generally no restrictions on the elements included in an empirical formula, although specific cases may vary. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the assumptions made during the calculation process.
chomool
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


0.2243 g of compound C give 0.3771 g of carbon dioxide, 0.0643 g of water and 0.2685 g of silver bromide. Determine the empirical formula of the compound.

Homework Equations


Why the empirical formula only takes C,H and Br into consideration, but singles out Ag?
Ans: C6H5Br

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
It must be because they assume you know that silver nitrate is used to determine halogens. They also assume the you have no oxygen in the compound and that oxygen is used in excess as a reagent in the C and H determination.
 
chemisttree said:
It must be because they assume you know that silver nitrate is used to determine halogens. They also assume the you have no oxygen in the compound and that oxygen is used in excess as a reagent in the C and H determination.


I see your point, thanks chemisttree
Once more question,
Will Ag be included into empirical formula at times?

In other words,
is there any restrictions in composition elements of the empirical formula?

Thanks.
 
chomool said:
is there any restrictions in composition elements of the empirical formula?

Generally speaking - no.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Thread 'How to find the pH of a galvanic cell (MIT OCW problem set)'
This is the final problem in this problem set from MIT OCW. Here is what I did to try to solve it The table cited in the problem is below We can easily spot the two redox couples that are in the electrochemical cell we are given. The hydrogen-based electrode has standard potential zero, and the silver-based electrode has standard potential 0.22. Thus, the hydrogen electrode, with the lower potential, is the reducing agent (ie, it is where oxidation happens) and is the anode. Electrons...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
100
Views
13K
Replies
9
Views
14K
Back
Top