Chemistry equilibrium clarifications

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies that the equilibrium constant (Kc) indicates the position of equilibrium, which reflects the relative amounts of reactants and products. Changing the concentration of reactants shifts the position of equilibrium without altering the Kc value. A specific reaction with a Kc of 4 is analyzed, where 2 moles of ethyl ethanoate and 2 moles of water are mixed, and the calculation of moles at equilibrium is discussed using stoichiometry. It is emphasized that while Kc remains constant, the equilibrium position can change according to Le Chatelier's Principle when concentrations are altered. The conversation concludes with a detailed example illustrating how to calculate equilibrium concentrations based on initial amounts and reaction stoichiometry.
quantumtron
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
-My notes says:
1.Value of equilibrium constant (Kc) provides a measure of the position of equilibrium.
2.Position of equilibrium indicates whether the system contains a larger proportion of reactants or products.

Next,
it mentioned, changing the concentration of reactants doesn't change the Kc value but shift the position. I am confused...

-Another question is, the value of equilibrium constant is 4 for the reaction below
CH3CO2H(l) + C2H5OH (l) ->-< CH3CO2C2H5(l) + H2O (l)

in an experiment, 2 mol of ethyl ethanoate and 2 mol of water are mixed. Calculate the number of moles of each substance present when equilibrium is reached.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
just to add, a really big thanks if advance. I have an upcoming chem test and this is fretting all over my brain.
 
quantumtron said:
changing the concentration of reactants doesn't change the Kc value but shift the position. I am confused...

Take a solution containing some substances in the equilibrium - reaction quotient (Q) has a value of Kc. Now add one of the substances already present. Initially Q is different from Kc, but the reaction will proceed (shifting the equilibrium) till Q is again equal to Kc.

-Another question is, the value of equilibrium constant is 4 for the reaction below
CH3CO2H(l) + C2H5OH (l) ->-< CH3CO2C2H5(l) + H2O (l)

in an experiment, 2 mol of ethyl ethanoate and 2 mol of water are mixed. Calculate the number of moles of each substance present when equilibrium is reached.

Write formula for Q (Kc) - there are four unknowns, however, using stoichiometry of the reaction you can easily express some of the unknowns using others. For example, number of moles of water and number of moles of ethyl ethanoate is identical, and number of moles of ethanol is 2 minus number of moles of ethyl ethanoate.

--
methods
 
Borek said:
Take a solution containing some substances in the equilibrium - reaction quotient (Q) has a value of Kc. Now add one of the substances already present. Initially Q is different from Kc, but the reaction will proceed (shifting the equilibrium) till Q is again equal to Kc.



Write formula for Q (Kc) - there are four unknowns, however, using stoichiometry of the reaction you can easily express some of the unknowns using others. For example, number of moles of water and number of moles of ethyl ethanoate is identical, and number of moles of ethanol is 2 minus number of moles of ethyl ethanoate.

--
chemical calculators - buffer calculator, concentration calculator
www.titrations.info - all about titration methods


im sorry but i still don't understand, since your Kc will remain constant, means your equilibrium position will not change right? But by LCP the position will change thus equilibrium constant Kc will change right? ( I am dam weak in chemistry :( )
 
No, equilibrium position will change, even if Kc stays identical.

Imagine we have a reaction

A + B <-> C

Q = \frac{[C]}{[A]<b>}</b>

(to simplify all stoichiometric coefficients are 1)

Let's assume Kc for this reaction is 1.

Imagine further we create a solution containing 1 mole of each A, B and C. Obviously

Q = \frac{[C]}{[A]<b>} = \frac{1}{1\times 1} = 1 = K_c</b>

and the solution is in equilibrium.

Now imagine we add additional 1 mole of A. Now we have 2 moles of A, 1 mole of B and 1 mole of C. Solution is no longer at equilibrium (Q = 2 <> Kc, so - according to the LeChatellier's Principle - it has to react. What happens is that equilibrium shifts right, till [A] = 1.7320, = 0.7320 and [C] = 1.2680 - then again

Q = \frac{[C]}{[A]<b>} = \frac{1.2680}{1.7320\times 0.7320} = 1 = K_c</b>

Where did I got these values from? I have calculated them using approach outlined in my previous post. Note how the amount by which concentration of C went up is identical to the amount by which concentrations of A and B went down. That's because of the reaction stoichiometry, for each mole of C produced one mole of both A and B are consumed.

--
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top