Chemistry Chemistry-Physical Changes and Intermolecular Forces

AI Thread Summary
Intermolecular forces (IMFs) significantly influence physical changes, such as boiling points, in substances. Higher IMFs require more energy to transition a substance between states of matter. In the provided example, H2O is expected to have the highest boiling point due to its strong hydrogen bonding, compared to CO2, CH4, Kr, and NH3. While NH3 also exhibits hydrogen bonding, H2O's structure leads to stronger interactions, making it the substance with the highest boiling point. Additionally, oxygen is more electronegative than nitrogen, which contributes to the strength of hydrogen bonds in water.
Flip
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone.

I have recently just started studying chemistry for my Junior year in High School. So you could say that I am a newbie at this. :smile:

I have small knowledge on the relationship between Intermolecular Forces and Physical changes. (Example: Boiling Point.)

So if the IMF of a molecule is high, would it take more energy(heat) to move it to a different state of matter? And if so how would the amount of energy be determined? How do you calculate the boiling point between 3 molecules?

Example:

46. Of the following substances,_____________ has the highest boiling point. (All numbers in the bottom are sub-scripts)

H20
CO2
CH4
Kr
NH3

A)H2O
B)CO2
C)CH4
D)Kr
E)NH3

Since H2O and NH3 have Hydrogen bonds I would assume that both those elements have the highest boiling points. Would more hydrogen atoms bonded on to the central atom mean that that molecule has the highest boiling point? If so then does that mean NH3 has the highest boiling point?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Does NH3 have a more hydrogen bond connections with respect to the individual molecule in an intermolecular "network." Also, which one has a higher electronegativity, Oxygen or Nitrogen?
 
Oxygen is more electronegative.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top