Chemistry very easy I forgot how to do this

  • Thread starter Thread starter GreenPrint
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemistry
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the minimum amount of potassium cyanide (KCN) needed to extract 29.0 g of gold using the reaction equation provided. The balanced equation shows that 4 moles of gold require 8 moles of KCN, establishing a 1:2 ratio. To find the moles of KCN needed, the user attempts to apply the mass-to-moles conversion but struggles with symbol usage and understanding the relationship between the reactants. The correct calculation indicates that 0.294 moles of KCN are necessary for the extraction of gold, but confusion arises regarding the coefficients in the balanced equation. Clarification on the stoichiometric ratios and proper symbol usage is needed to resolve the user's confusion.
GreenPrint
Messages
1,186
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For many years the recovery of gold-that is, the separation of gold from other materials-involved the use of potassium cyanide:

4AU + 8KCN + 02 +2H20 -> 4KAu(CN)2 + 4KOH

What is the minimum amount of KCN in moles needed to extract 29.0 g (about an ounce) of gold?

Now my question is one of the proper equations as I don't know what symbol to use for which quantity...

I understand that

mass = (molecular mass)(moles of mass)
were mass has units of grams, g, symbol used curvy M, mass of each element in the compound times subscripts of the element i.e. C2 would be 2(12.00g) = 24.00 g
mole of mass is the coeficent before the compound in the balanced reaction equation

m = Mn

I then would go to use subscripts were if the question asked about a compound on in part of the reactant balanced equation I would just use a R for a subscript and a Y for yield

now this problem bothers me

dividing the equation above by Mn I get

m/(Mn) = 1

and then go do the problem but sense the question is making reference to two reactants I had to use A and B for subscripts as well were A is the gold compound and B is the KCN compound

(m_R_A)/( (M_R_A)(n_R_A) ) = (m_R_B)/( (M_R_B)(n_R_B) )

solving for m_R_B

( (m_R_A)(M_R_B)(n_R_B) )/( (M_R_B)(n_R_B) ) = m_R_B

now my probelm is that I know that m_R_A is given in the problem 29.0 g so I now that m = Mn solving for n I get m/M I need to solve for n so clearly then

(m_R_B)/(M_R_B) = n_R_B = ( (m_R_A)(n_R_B) )/( (M_R_B)(n_R_B) )

clearly my use of symbols is wrong but it makes sense were n_R_B is the is the 8 and also what the probelm is asking for me clearly a probelm but here is what I did

( (29.0 g Au)(8 mol KCN) )/( (197.0 (g Au)/(mol Au))(4 mol Au) ) = .294 mol KCN

clearly this is a probelm even though its write because in the equation I said that KCN was 8 moles but when I solved I got .294 mol KCN are these two different values because they are both the amount of moles of KCN

I'm kind of confused please let me know how to make sense of this in my equation and understand how they are different and the symbols I should use to indicate so as I don't know how to do this please let me know if you don't understand

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't make this more complicated than it has to be. Remember your equation:
4AU + 8KCN + 02 +2H20 -> 4KAu(CN)2 + 4KOH

You will see that for every mole of gold you need how many moles of cyanide? Can you tell from just looking at your equation? What is the ratio of gold/cyanide?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top