Chilled water loop pressure and velocity

AI Thread Summary
A chilled water loop is used for the AC system in a workplace, and issues with a rooftop unit have prompted an investigation into potential causes. The pipe specifications include a diameter of 2.5 inches, a flow rate of 53 GPM, and a length of approximately 135 feet. Pressure in the pipe can be determined through calculations of pressure drop, which is influenced by pipe length and friction. The length of the pipe indirectly affects velocity by impacting pressure drop and flow rate. Friction and viscous forces within the liquid contribute to the pressure drop in the system.
tmerc
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Where i work has a chilled water loop to every building for the ac system. A rooftop unit has not been performing as it should so we are investigating into the possible causes. Right now i am trying to come up with the different variables that accompany the givens. I know the pipe is 2.5", the flow rate must have been measured at some point because one of the drawings says 53 GPM, and the length of the pipe is approximately 135'. Now is there any way to determine the pressure in the pipe with these givens. And also, would the length of the pipe effect the velocity or is that just based off the flow rate and diameter?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You can determine the pressure drop through that length of pipe, but that's about it.

The length of pipe affects the velocity indirectly. As the length of pipe affects the pressure drop, it in turn affects the flow rate, which in turn determines (along with pipe diameter) the flow velocity.
 
Correct me if i am wrong, the pressure drop is causes by the friction on the inside of the pipe?
 
tmerc said:
Correct me if i am wrong, the pressure drop is causes by the friction on the inside of the pipe?

Yep, pipe friction and losses due to viscous forces within the liquid itself (turbulence and all that), chiefly.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top