Chocolate milk mechanics question

  • Thread starter Thread starter aspodkfpo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mechanics of chocolate milk and its interaction with plain milk in a physics problem. Participants express confusion over the omission of white milk in the model and question how it affects the kinetic energy of the system. There is debate about the forces exerted between the two types of milk and the implications of mixing on energy dissipation. Additionally, the conversion of gravitational potential energy to horizontal kinetic energy is unclear, with suggestions for a more accurate model involving vertical and horizontal movements. Overall, the complexities of fluid dynamics and energy transfer in this scenario remain a point of contention.
aspodkfpo
Messages
148
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
below
Relevant Equations
below
https://www.asi.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/ASOE_2017-Physics-solutions.pdf

Question 11 b)
I don't see why they ignore the white milk in the middle in their model. Nor do I understand how they get that the white milk is also traveling at U. As for the rest of the algebra, there's no need to explain.

Do not understand 11c) statements:
- "Chocolate and plain milk might mix: any mixing will dissipate the kinetic energy of the wave at a microscopic level."
- "The chocolate milk and plain milk will also exert forces on each other. The wave is not made up of two blocks!" - Don't two blocks also exert forces on each other? What difference is the force exerted by these liquids on each other? What force is exerted by these liquids on each other?

Not to sure on the inner mechanics of how gravitational potential energy gets changed into a horizontal kinetic energy (normally its via a ramp). Someone explain please.

Please help.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
aspodkfpo said:
Question 11 b)
I don't see why they ignore the white milk in the middle in their model.
Me neither. If blocks 2 and 4 gain KE then all of the milk does. The only difference is that blocks moving vertically will move at a different speed from those going horizontally because they have a different distance to travel.
Arguably, the model should have a portion of the plain milk moving vertically up all the way along. The speeds of the vertical and horizontal movements would reduce as you go to the right along the tank. Similarly, the descending mix. Overall, it may look like an "irrotational flow".
Or, to keep it simple, make blocks 3 and 4 adjacent to 1 and 2, leaving the rest of the tank static. This would get close to their equation, but still needs terms for the KE of 1 and 3.
aspodkfpo said:
Chocolate and plain milk might mix: any mixing will dissipate the kinetic energy of the wave at a microscopic level.
Yes, the boundary would not be stable. Likely to be places where parts of block 2 go ahead, punching to the right, while at other parts of the boundary some plain milk backwashes into the chocolate. A bit like cells in convection.
aspodkfpo said:
The chocolate milk and plain milk will also exert forces on each other. The wave is not made up of two blocks!
Eh? No idea what they are getting at.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top