I Christoffel symbols of Schwarzschild metric with Lagrangian

Stella.Physics
Messages
62
Reaction score
13
So the Schwarzschild metric is given by

ds2= -(1-2M/r)dt2 + (1-2M/r)-1dr2+r22+r2sin2θ dφ2

and the Lagragian is ##{\frac{d}{dσ}}[{\frac{1}{L}}{\frac{dx^α}{dσ}}] + {\frac{∂L}{∂x^α}}=0##

with L = dτ/dσ. So for each α=0,1,2,3 we have

##{\frac{d^2 x^1}{dτ^2}}=0## for Minkowski spacetime

also the geadesic equation is ##{\frac{d^2 x^a}{dτ^2}}+Γ^a_{bc}{\frac{dx^b}{dτ}}{\frac{dx^c}{dτ}}=0##

So what happens in the Schwarzschild metric and how can I find the Christoffel symbols from the Schwarzschild metric and the geodesic equations?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For slower-than-light geodesics, you can use an effective Lagrangian (which is basically the square of the one you use):

\mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{2} g_{\mu \nu} U^\mu U^\nu

where g_{\mu \nu} is a component of the metric tensor, and U^\mu = \frac{dx^\mu}{d\sigma}. This is slightly easier to work with than the one you are using (although it's a little work to see that they lead to the same equations of motion). The Lagrangian equations of motion for this lagrangian are:

\frac{d}{ds} \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial U^\mu} - \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial x^\mu} = 0

This gives the following form of the geodesic equation:

g_{\mu \nu} \frac{dU^\nu}{d\sigma} + [\frac{\partial g_{\mu \nu}}{\partial x^\lambda} - \frac{1}{2} \frac{\partial g_{\lambda \nu}}{\partial x^\mu}] U^\lambda U^\nu = 0

Unfortunately, the quantity in square brackets (call it Q_{\mu \nu \lambda}) is not exactly equal to the Christoffel symbol \Gamma_{\mu \nu \lambda} \equiv g_{\mu \alpha} \Gamma^\alpha_{\nu \lambda} = \frac{1}{2}(\frac{\partial g_{\mu\nu}}{\partial x^\lambda} + \frac{\partial g_{\mu\lambda}}{\partial x^\nu}- \frac{\partial g_{\lambda \nu}}{\partial x^\mu}). However, if you compute Q_{\mu \nu \lambda}, then you can find \Gamma_{\mu \nu \lambda} by symmetrizing:

\Gamma_{\mu \nu \lambda} = \frac{1}{2} [Q_{\mu \nu \lambda} + Q_{\mu \lambda \nu}]
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top