Christoffel Symbols: Solving GR Homework | Fred

n1mrod
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hey Guys,

I'm new here on the forum, and I hope someone can help me out.
I'm solving one of my GR homework exercises and I'm asked to find the christoffel symbols corresponding to cylindrical coordinates.
I'll post my work and please correct if you see mistakes.
I found the metric to be dR^2 + (R^2)(dtheta^2) + dZ^2
therefore
Gab=
1 0 0
0 R^-2 0
0 0 1

Can somebody kind of explain to me how to proceed with these calculations?

Thanks a lot!
Fred.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You'll have to explain how you got that strange result before anyone can help. Where did the e come from?
 
Dick said:
You'll have to explain how you got that strange result before anyone can help. Where did the e come from?

Hey I'm sorry, I was writing the topic and the second part I copied from my other homework assignment, sorry I'm going to fix that.

Until the "matrix" Gab is what I did, but I'm not very sure how to calculate the christoffel from there, can you help me?
 
You calculate the christoffel by evaluating a summation of partial derivatives of the metric times the inverse metric. Again, you are not giving us much to go on.
 
Okay, but I put the metric I found. As you said, to calculate the symbols it's only necessary the Metric and the inverse metric, the inverse metric is calculated straight from the metric right? So I believe we have everything that is needed, but please correct me if I'm wrong.
Thanks.
 
I think so. If you are going wrong, you haven't done so yet.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top