Circle Deflection: Calc Outbound Angle After Collision

  • Thread starter Thread starter cam875
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle Deflection
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the outbound angle of a circle after colliding with another circle, the reflection law is applicable, where the inbound angle equals the outbound angle, measured from the tangent at the collision point. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the geometry of the collision, specifically how angles are defined relative to the tangent plane at the point of impact. Clarification is sought on whether this reflection principle is sufficient for accurate calculations. The conversation highlights the need for precise definitions and understanding of angles in the context of circular collisions. Accurate calculations are crucial for predicting the post-collision trajectory of the moving circle.
cam875
Messages
227
Reaction score
0
how do u calculate what one circle does when it collides with another circle at a specific point on a specific heading? I need to know how to figure out the outbound angle that the circle will travel on after colliding.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't this just the reflection law, \theta_{inbound}=\theta_{outbound} with theta measured on the tangent (plane) of the collision surface at the collision point?
 
im not sure that's why I am asking.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top