Circle eqauation - can ne1 double check my work

Agent_J
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Find the center and radius of the circle
16x^2 + 16y^2 + 8x + 32y + 1 = 0

So first i simplified the equation by taking out the 16
so i got:

16 (x^2 + 1/2x + y^2 + 2y) = -1
16 (x^2 + 1/2x + 1/16) + 16 (y^2 + 2y + 1) = -1 + 1 + 1
16 (x + 1/4)^2 + 16 (y + 1)^2 = 1

Center = (-1/4, -1)
Radius = 1

Are my calculations correct? Do I need to take out the 16 in my equation?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I believe you should write it in the form (x + 1/4)^2 + (y + 1)^2 = 1/16 = (1/4)^2. Then you can see that the radius is 1/4.
 
uh oh, then I must have done something wrong because the answer for the Radius should be just 1 :frown:
 
16 (x^2 + 1/2x + 1/16) + 16 (y^2 + 2y + 1) = -1 + 1 + 1

On the left hand side you added 16 on the right hand side you added 1.
If you add 16 to both sides it will work out.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top