MHB How Do You Determine If a Point Lies on a Circle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle Radius
AI Thread Summary
To determine if a point lies on a circle, the equation of the circle centered at (0, 0) with a radius of 1 is x^2 + y^2 = 1. The point (3/5, 4/5) is tested by substituting its coordinates into the equation, resulting in (3/5)^2 + (4/5)^2 = 1. The calculations confirm that 9/25 + 16/25 equals 25/25, which simplifies to 1, indicating that the point does indeed lie on the circle. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the equation without assuming the conclusion. Understanding these steps is crucial for verifying points on a circle.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
1. Sketch the circle of radius 1 centered at (0, 0).

(A) Write the equation of this circle.

I must use x^2 + y^2 = r^2.

The radius is 1. This means r = 1.

The equation is x^2 + y^2 = 1. Correct?

B. Does the point (3/5, 4/5) lie on this circle?

(3/5)^2 + (4/5)^2 = 1^2

(9/25) + (16/25) = 1

(9 + 16)/25 = 1

25/25 = 1

1 = 1

I say yes. Right?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RTCNTC said:
1. Sketch the circle of radius 1 centered at (0, 0).

(A) Write the equation of this circle.

I must use x^2 + y^2 = r^2.

The radius is 1. This means r = 1.

The equation is x^2 + y^2 = 1. Correct?

Correct.

RTCNTC said:
B. Does the point (3/5, 4/5) lie on this circle?

(3/5)^2 + (4/5)^2 = 1^2

(9/25) + (16/25) = 1

(9 + 16)/25 = 1

25/25 = 1

1 = 1

I say yes. Right?

Right. Good work!
 
Good to know that I am right.
 
RTCNTC said:
B. Does the point (3/5, 4/5) lie on this circle?

(3/5)^2 + (4/5)^2 = 1^2

(9/25) + (16/25) = 1

(9 + 16)/25 = 1

25/25 = 1

1 = 1

In the first and following lines above, you are assuming what you are trying to show. The above can be properly written as

$$\left(\frac35\right)^2+\left(\frac45\right)^2=\frac{9}{25}+\frac{16}{25}=\frac{9+16}{25}=\frac{25}{25}=1$$

:)
 
greg1313 said:
In the first and following lines above, you are assuming what you are trying to show. The above can be properly written as

$$\left(\frac35\right)^2+\left(\frac45\right)^2=\frac{9}{25}+\frac{16}{25}=\frac{9+16}{25}=\frac{25}{25}=1$$

:)

Isn't that what I did?
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
59
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top