Circuit analysis problems with answers

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights frustrations with a circuit analysis textbook that offers limited and often incorrect answers to problems. The user seeks recommendations for free resources or textbooks that provide additional practice problems and correct answers. Suggestions include using Google to find solutions by searching for "circuit analysis problems and solutions." Additionally, there is an offer for community members to post specific questions for verification of the textbook's answers. This conversation emphasizes the need for reliable study materials in preparation for an upcoming exam.
Log
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I wasn't sure where to post this, figured this would do. My current textbook explains the subject well. The problems really suck however, they only cover basic calculations. Only half of the problems have answers, and a lot of the answers are wrong so it's easy for me to get stuck trying to get the answer given by the book.

I have an exam very soon and would be grateful if you know some free textbook or website with problems (and answers) that I can use for practice.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Log said:
Hi,

I wasn't sure where to post this, figured this would do. My current textbook explains the subject well. The problems really suck however, they only cover basic calculations. Only half of the problems have answers, and a lot of the answers are wrong so it's easy for me to get stuck trying to get the answer given by the book.

I have an exam very soon and would be grateful if you know some free textbook or website with problems (and answers) that I can use for practice.

Thanks!

I googled the title of your thread, and got lots of hits (actually Google suggest the word solutions instead of answers for a better search). See if this list helps:

http://www.google.com/search?source...ns+&gs_l=hp..0.0l4.0.0.1.8363...0.YIesIXzLizM

.
 
Hi Log! :smile:
Log said:
Only half of the problems have answers, and a lot of the answers are wrong so it's easy for me to get stuck trying to get the answer given by the book.

Post the questions, and your answers, here at the homework section of PF, and we'll confirm if the book is wrong. :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Back
Top