Circuit breaker, clearing a fault current

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a circuit design using a Schmitt trigger configuration, a MOSFET, and a mechanical switch to clear fault currents. Participants clarify that a closed switch causes higher than normal current through the MOSFET, which leads to voltage changes at the inverting input of the Schmitt trigger. The output of the Schmitt trigger controls the MOSFET, turning it on or off based on the current levels, but concerns arise about the timing and behavior of the switch and MOSFET during fault conditions. Additionally, there are inquiries about achieving specific voltage references and managing the switching characteristics of the circuit. The conversation highlights the complexities of designing reliable fault-clearing mechanisms in electronic circuits.
knowledgeseeki
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
hi could someone please explain the attached circuit to me in detail.

From what i understand:

the open circuit caused by the opened switch in series with the resistance causes a fault current in the system.
This higher than normal current across the 200 ohm resistor causes a high voltage to flow through the mosfet and into the inverting input.

the input is then compared to a reference( using a schmitt trigger config Threshold values set to 1 an 5V. )

when input increases past the high threshold value set the output is low, when input is below high threshold output is high.

The low output will turn the mosfet off and the high output will turn it on.

When the mosfet turns on, a voltage is sent to the switch closing the switch.

This switch should not close until the fault current is cleared and the switch doesn't re-open unless reset.

based on what i explain is my design correct.

Think of what i am doing as a way to clear a fault current using a schmitt trigger configuration+ a mosfet+ a mechnical switch

please help.
 

Attachments

  • ph1.png
    ph1.png
    4.9 KB · Views: 715
Engineering news on Phys.org
knowledgeseeki said:
From what i understand:

the open circuit caused by the opened switch in series with the resistance causes a fault current in the system.
An open switch doesn't cause a fault current. The closed switch causes higher than normal current through the MOSFET.
This higher than normal current across the 200 ohm resistor causes a high voltage to flow through the mosfet and into the inverting input.

the input is then compared to a reference( using a schmitt trigger config Threshold values set to 1 an 5V. )

when input increases past the high threshold value set the output is low, when input is below high threshold output is high.

The low output will turn the mosfet off and the high output will turn it on.

When the mosfet turns on, a voltage is sent to the switch closing the switch.
It is not apparent how this last action happens. In any case, after clearing the fault you want the switch to OPEN and the MOSFET to turn ON and that puts you back to normal operation.
 
Thank you, so when the switch is closed is what causes the more than normal current.
When the mosfet turns on how does it make the switch to turn on?

thank you though you explain things really well.
 
knowledgeseeki said:
Thank you, so when the switch is closed is what causes the more than normal current.
When the switch is closed, it places a 5Ω resistor in parallel with the normal 200Ω, so current can be approximately x40 larger.
When the mosfet turns on how does it make the switch to turn on?
We aren't told. Presumably, someone or something will independently turn the switch back on or off.

The MOSFET itself will be automatically turned back ON immediately after being turned OFF, the speed of the Schmitt trigger causing this. The MOSFET switching will repeat over and over until the switch is opened to remove the fault current. The circuit doesn't seem to accomplish much.
 
hey how do i get a 0.2V as my reference if i know that R1 is 10K

i would like to get a 0.2V voltage set but i cnt figure out how to do it please help.

based on the posted schematic.
how do i get my mosfet to switch on and off?

it doesn't seem to switch, because the voltage at the source of my mosfet is just a straight line.

Would my voltage varry when the switch goes from an open position to a closed position? if so why isn't my mosfet reflecting this.
 
Last edited:
knowledgeseeki said:
hey how do i get a 0.2V as my reference if i know that R1 is 10K

i would like to get a 0.2V voltage set but i cnt figure out how to do it please help.
The Schmitt Trigger comparator has two switching levels. Do you want to make the lower one 0.2V, or the higher one?
based on the posted schematic.
how do i get my mosfet to switch on and off?

it doesn't seem to switch, because the voltage at the source of my mosfet is just a straight line.
With R5 being 0.1Ω, and the comparator requiring 5V to switch, you need 50A through R5 to trigger the MOSFET OFF.
Would my voltage varry when the switch goes from an open position to a closed position? if so why isn't my mosfet reflecting this.
What value is your voltage at R5 when the switch is (a) OPEN, and (b) CLOSED?

Are you constructing this using hardware, or are you using a computer simulation?
 
hi, in the the schematic below i would like my upper trigger point to be at 3 and my lower trigger point at 1. How do i choose my resistors appropriately?
i can't seem to get the hysteresis right, so my output keeps switching rapidly.

i am going to construct this design on a veroboard after i run a few simulations and i am satisfied with it.

My R5 (currently R6) has been changed to a 1W power resistor now. Wouldn't want to burn anything.

i am currently supplying my comparator with +15V
 

Attachments

  • schmiit question.png
    schmiit question.png
    21 KB · Views: 558
If you construct this on breadboard, you may find the tracks or contacts are damaged by 5A.

If you supply the comparator with a single-ended 15V supply, not ±15V, with [strike]R9=120k, R8=22k, and R10=68k, the upper switching level will be 5V.[/strike]

EDIT:
With R9=560k, R8=22k, and R10=100k, the upper switching level will be 3.1V
 
Last edited:
NascentOxygen said:
If you construct this on breadboard, you may find the tracks or contacts are damaged by 5A.

If you supply the comparator with a single-ended 15V supply, not ±15V, with [strike]R9=120k, R8=22k, and R10=68k, the upper switching level will be 5V.[/strike]

EDIT:
With R9=560k, R8=22k, and R10=100k, the upper switching level will be 3.1V

Thanks, built it today. Burnt a few things, even though i was sure only 4A was supposed to run through my system.

thank you let me try that now.

actually those values don't work even if i only use a single ended 15V supply
My trigger output switches too quickly from its low state to high state and then takes progressively longer to switch from high back to low state.

what formula did you use?
 
  • #10
knowledgeseeki said:
Thanks, built it today. Burnt a few things, even though i was sure only 4A was supposed to run through my system.
With R13 being 5Ω, if you were to have 4A through it that amounts to 16*5=80watts
so R13 would need to be a big power resistor, or else something like 15 resistors, each 10W and in parallel.
Actually those values don't work even if i only use a single ended 15V supply
My trigger output switches too quickly from its low state to high state and then takes progressively longer to switch from high back to low state.
Maybe it is working, but just not how you'd imagined it would?
I expect the MOSFET will switch on and off a few hundred times per second. When the comparator switches, it turns off the MOSFET causing current to fall towards zero. As the level of current falls below what will trigger the comparator, the comparator output returns high and turns on the MOSFET. Current returns, and triggers the comparator, etc..

▻ When the comparator output is +15V, the R8-R9-R10 resistor network forms a simple potential divider where two of the resistors return to +15V.

▻ When the comparator output is 0V, the R8-R9-R10 resistor network forms a simple potential divider where two of the resistors return to ground.

The voltage trigger levels are 3V and 0.5V with R8-R9-R10 as 22k, 560k, and 100k, resp.
 
  • #11
NascentOxygen said:
With R13 being 5Ω, if you were to have 4A through it that amounts to 16*5=80watts
so R13 would need to be a big power resistor, or else something like 15 resistors, each 10W and in parallel.

Maybe it is working, but just not how you'd imagined it would?
I expect the MOSFET will switch on and off a few hundred times per second. When the comparator switches, it turns off the MOSFET causing current to fall towards zero. As the level of current falls below what will trigger the comparator, the comparator output returns high and turns on the MOSFET. Current returns, and triggers the comparator, etc..

▻ When the comparator output is +15V, the R8-R9-R10 resistor network forms a simple potential divider where two of the resistors return to +15V.

▻ When the comparator output is 0V, the R8-R9-R10 resistor network forms a simple potential divider where two of the resistors return to ground.

The voltage trigger levels are 3V and 0.5V with R8-R9-R10 as 22k, 560k, and 100k, resp.

my comparator has 2 output states though
a high of +15V and a low of -15V. i am using dual supply
i can't find any examples of a dual supplied schmitt trigger.

i need to use one so that my on and off periods are equal, with a single supply i noticed that the off period is always quite abit longer than the off period.

also slowing the period and pulse width improved my output response.
 
  • #12
knowledgeseeki said:
my comparator has 2 output states though
a high of +15V and a low of -15V. i am using dual supply
i can't find any examples of a dual supplied schmitt trigger.

i need to use one so that my on and off periods are equal, with a single supply i noticed that the off period is always quite abit longer than the off period.
I doubt that you do need to change the Schmitt trigger. Are you still using the basic circuit in your post #7? Because, in that circuit there is no designed "on period" or "off period". There is no monostable multivibrator. There is no periodic signal whose duration you have considered or calculated.

Maybe you are referring to the switching rate you see the MOSFET is being subjected to? But that is not something you have designed for; it's due to the slew rate of the op-amp and the battery/load characteristics, and is something I expect you were not anticipating. If you want to control the rate of automatic switching, you will have to incorporate a monostable multivibrator, as was used in one of your original schemes. (I'm curious, how many times per second does your circuit, as it stands, switch the load?) What delay would you like before the load is switched by the MOSFET?
also slowing the period and pulse width improved my output response.
What do you mean by "output response"?
 
Last edited:
  • #13
NascentOxygen said:
I doubt that you do need to change the Schmitt trigger. Are you still using the basic circuit in your post #7? Because, in that circuit there is no designed "on period" or "off period". There is no monostable multivibrator. There is no periodic signal whose duration you have considered or calculated.

Maybe you are referring to the switching rate you see the MOSFET is being subjected to? But that is not something you have designed for; it's due to the slew rate of the op-amp and the battery/load characteristics, and is something I expect you were not anticipating. If you want to control the rate of automatic switching, you will have to incorporate a monostable multivibrator, as was used in one of your original schemes. (I'm curious, how many times per second does your circuit, as it stands, switch the load?) What delay would you like before the load is switched by the MOSFET?

What do you mean by "output response"?
hey sorry, to be honest i was confused for a while and i was doing the wrong thing

here is what my complete circuit design looks like.

The mosfet starts on at t=0
At t=1ms the switch closes causing fault current which gets cleared.
At t=3ms, the breaker is reset.

How do i design a drive circuit supplying ±20V to my mosfet in order to turn it on or off.

The input coming into the push pull circuit attached below is ±15,V i need to boost the 15V input to give a 20V output.
 

Attachments

  • forum.png
    forum.png
    29.1 KB · Views: 594
  • push pull.png
    push pull.png
    3 KB · Views: 626
Last edited:
  • #14
knowledgeseeki said:
The mosfet starts on at t=0
At t=1ms the switch closes causing fault current which gets cleared.
At t=3ms, the breaker is reset.
Who or what performs the 3ms timing for the breaker reset? (No circuit is shown.) That is a very short time within which an overload can be expected to be removed.

How do i design a drive circuit supplying ±20V to my mosfet in order to turn it on or off.
Isn't the op-amp's output driving your MOSFET switch? I'd have thought 15V and 0V should suffice.

The input coming into the push pull circuit attached below is ±15,V i need to boost the 15V input to give a 20V output.
Are you sure you need this?
Anyway, if you correctly copy a working amplifier circuit from somewhere, it should work.
 
  • #15
I need something to boost the ± 15V coming into the Mosfet
because when i am building it the Mosfet i am using requires ±20V
thats why.

the reset button is the switch timed at t=3ms connected to 0V.
 

Attachments

  • forum.png
    forum.png
    26 KB · Views: 569
  • #16
knowledgeseeki said:
the Mosfet i am using requires ±20V
thats why.
I doubt it. I think you should begin building parts of this circuit, starting with just the MOSFET switch and a drain load of the LED and associated resistor. Don't bother about the Schmitt trigger, leave that out at this stage, and instead manually switch the gate of the FET to either 0V or 15V and see whether that switches it. (Keep a voltmeter constantly connected between drain and source to monitor how well the FET is switching.) If this works well, then close U2 and keep your finger on the FET to make sure it doesn't get hot. It shouldn't get hot whether it's ON or OFF.

Don't leave the gate connected nowhere; it should go to either 0V or 15V. If you leave it floating it may half turn on and cause the FET to get hot and burn out. The safest approach would be to put a resistor of a few 100kΩ from the gate to ground, by default that connects the gate to 0V. Leave the resistor there, and whenever you need 15V just connect 15V to the gate.

Report back what you find.

BTW, what is your reason for adding R6 in series with R13?
 
  • #17
NascentOxygen said:
I doubt it. I think you should begin building parts of this circuit, starting with just the MOSFET switch and a drain load of the LED and associated resistor. Don't bother about the Schmitt trigger, leave that out at this stage, and instead manually switch the gate of the FET to either 0V or 15V and see whether that switches it. (Keep a voltmeter constantly connected between drain and source to monitor how well the FET is switching.) If this works well, then close U2 and keep your finger on the FET to make sure it doesn't get hot. It shouldn't get hot whether it's ON or OFF.

Don't leave the gate connected nowhere; it should go to either 0V or 15V. If you leave it floating it may half turn on and cause the FET to get hot and burn out. The safest approach would be to put a resistor of a few 100kΩ from the gate to ground, by default that connects the gate to 0V. Leave the resistor there, and whenever you need 15V just connect 15V to the gate.

Report back what you find.

BTW, what is your reason for adding R6 in series with R13?

put R13 in series with R6 because i wanted the R13+Diode connection to be my fault indication
From what i now, know R13 and the diode should be in parallel with R6 is this correct.

I will report back, however your suggestion will only work with a Mosfet that requires less than 20V to turn on or -20V to turn off. the IRF9530N requires 20V.
 
  • #18
That's an impressive power MOSFET you've got hold of. Go cautiously, don't want to damage it. For the IRF9530N, its drain should be negative, so reverse your 20V supply.

Vgate of ±20V is the maximum rating. From Fig. 1 (see datasheet), a gate voltage of –15V should be ample to turn it fully on. It will be fully off with about –4V, but try it with 0V since that level may be more convenient. (Looks like the Schmitt trigger will need to be modified.)

data sheet: http://alltransistors.com/pdfview.php?doc=irf9530n.pdf&dire=_international_rectifier[/color]
 
  • #19
NascentOxygen said:
That's an impressive power MOSFET you've got hold of. Go cautiously, don't want to damage it. For the IRF9530N, its drain should be negative, so reverse your 20V supply.

Vgate of ±20V is the maximum rating. From Fig. 1 (see datasheet), a gate voltage of –15V should be ample to turn it fully on. It will be fully off with about –4V, but try it with 0V since that level may be more convenient. (Looks like the Schmitt trigger will need to be modified.)

data sheet: http://alltransistors.com/pdfview.php?doc=irf9530n.pdf&dire=_international_rectifier[/color]

so it would seem. what is weird is that i cannot find any good examples of dual supplied schmitt triggers. To achieve the 0V to turn the Mosfet off, i would have to change my current schmitt trigger to a single supply.

One thing i noticed with my design is that after my fault current has been cleared it, the current doesn't return to its original value

on another note: what do you know about zero current/voltage crossing??
I am trying to design my circuit breaker to have this feature.

To me zero crossing is when the voltage or current crosses below zero a switching device will switch. Zero switching won't happen before that. is this correct??
 
Last edited:
  • #20
With your load powered by DC there will be no zero crossings.

Only when the load is purely resistive does the zero crossing of the AC voltage co-incide with the zero crossing of the current. With a partly inductive load if you can switch at a zero crossing of the load voltage, this is not a zero crossing of the current. I think you should defer that enhancement until you have perfected the basic switch.

While testing the current design, keep the load resistive. If you add inductance you may damage the device. For inductive loads steps need to be taken to deal with voltage spikes; I think you had this in the very first (of your many) schematics.
 
  • #21
NascentOxygen said:
With your load powered by DC there will be no zero crossings.

Only when the load is purely resistive does the zero crossing of the AC voltage co-incide with the zero crossing of the current. With a partly inductive load if you can switch at a zero crossing of the load voltage, this is not a zero crossing of the current. I think you should defer that enhancement until you have perfected the basic switch.

While testing the current design, keep the load resistive. If you add inductance you may damage the device. For inductive loads steps need to be taken to deal with voltage spikes; I think you had this in the very first (of your many) schematics.

sorry I've sent soo many schematics thanks for your patience though
found something out today. My built circuit wasnt working because i somehow thought i was using an n-channel mosfet meanwhile i was using a p-channel.

Would test that on monday and let you know if that makes a difference.

ON pspice though, the current through my load seems to fall as opposed to increase when i close my switch.
 
  • #22
knowledgeseeki said:
found something out today. My built circuit wasnt working because i somehow thought i was using an n-channel mosfet meanwhile i was using a p-channel.
Your first schematics showed a n-channel, but then without warning you changed to a p-channel.

You need to reverse the direction of the LED indicator in the load when you reverse the supply voltage.
 
  • #23
NascentOxygen said:
Your first schematics showed a n-channel, but then without warning you changed to a p-channel.

You need to reverse the direction of the LED indicator in the load when you reverse the supply voltage.

sorry.
 
  • #24
hi, do you know anything on CMOS Quad bilateral switch.
I am using this switch instead of a timed switch since the time switch doesn't respond to the Mosfet turning off.

About the Mosfet i am using an n-channel i was connecting the mosfet wrong that's why it wasn't working the way i wanted it to.

its all fixed now.

Just the switch, to cause the fault. Then am all done. thank you very much for your help.
 
Last edited:
  • #25
knowledgeseeki said:
hi, do you know anything on CMOS Quad bilateral switch.
I am using this switch instead of a timed switch since the time switch doesn't respond to the Mosfet turning off.
The 4066 has an ON resistance of typically 125Ω for 15V operation. This isn't going to be any use for switching your 20 ampere overload, if that's what you plan to use it for. CMOS is a low power family of gates and switches.

Is this final circuit going to do anything useful, or is it just something you worked on as a learning exercise?
 
  • #26
no just an exercise
still deciding if i want to be an engineer
the quad switch was only to be used in simulation but seeing its limitations it still won't have worked.
i am using a push switch as my mech switch causing the overcurrent
i am using the CD4013B as my flip flop
and LM393 as my comparator
 
  • #27
hi, sorry i have been out of touch for a while could you please tell me why
in this circuit the 200ohm resistor current drops from 100mA to 80mA when the switch closes at 1ms
meanwhile it should increase
My entire circuit attached to it would make no sense unless the current in the 200ohm resistor increases
 

Attachments

  • physics F.jpg
    physics F.jpg
    37.3 KB · Views: 431
  • #28
knowledgeseeki said:
hi, sorry i have been out of touch for a while
We've missed you.

could you please tell me why
in this circuit the 200ohm resistor current drops from 100mA to 80mA when the switch closes at 1ms
meanwhile it should increase
My entire circuit attached to it would make no sense unless the current in the 200ohm resistor increases
The switch will increase the current through the 1Ω resistor, and isn't that what you are wanting? But nothing you do can increase the current through the 200Ω. The switch and R26 divert some of R25's current around R26, so the current in R25 inevitably drops.

You could do the resistor current calculations and see how paper figures compare with what you measured. When the switch is open the circuit is 20V applied across 200Ω and 1Ω (plus unknown MOSFET resistance). With the switch closed, a 5Ω resistor is placed in parallel with the 200Ω. Current through the 1Ω increases, but how is the current shared between the parallel pair?
 
  • #29
NascentOxygen said:
We've missed you.


The switch will increase the current through the 1Ω resistor, and isn't that what you are wanting? But nothing you do can increase the current through the 200Ω. The switch and R26 divert some of R25's current around R26, so the current in R25 inevitably drops.

You could do the resistor current calculations and see how paper figures compare with what you measured. When the switch is open the circuit is 20V applied across 200Ω and 1Ω (plus unknown MOSFET resistance). With the switch closed, a 5Ω resistor is placed in parallel with the 200Ω. Current through the 1Ω increases, but how is the current shared between the parallel pair?

Thanks
yes i want the switch to increase the current through the 1ohm resistor when the switch closes.
so that a voltage in the opposite direction is induced and goes into the negative input of my opamp

What i actually expected when i caculated it on paper was that when the switch is open the current coming into the Mosfet from the drain should be at 0.1
When the switch is closed the current coming into the mosfet should be at 4.1

Based on the parallel combination of the 200Ω and 5Ω resistor being 4.8Ω
20/4.8 = 4.1 appx
20/200= 0.1 appx

Are you saying my assumption that the current in the 200Ω is supposed to increase is completely false.
If so i am really really confused.

the Mosfet i am using is the IRF150 with an rds on of 0.055Ω

in a simple circuit such as the one attached could you please tell me why the current in my 200Ω
resistor doesn't change when i close the switch at 1ms
the current in the 200Ω just stays at 100mA through out

i don't think that is what should happen

is my assumption that the current in my 200Ω should increase wrong?
 

Attachments

  • simple.jpg
    simple.jpg
    32.6 KB · Views: 385
Last edited:
  • #30
knowledgeseeki said:
What i actually expected when i caculated it on paper was that when the switch is open the current coming into the Mosfet from the drain should be at 0.1
When the switch is closed the current coming into the mosfet should be at 4.1

Based on the parallel combination of the 200Ω and 5Ω resistor being 4.8Ω
20/4.8 = 4.1 appx
20/200= 0.1 appx
Those seem about right.

Are you saying my assumption that the current in the 200Ω is supposed to increase is completely false.
Completely false.

in a simple circuit such as the one attached could you please tell me why the current in my 200Ω
resistor doesn't change when i close the switch at 1ms
the current in the 200Ω just stays at 100mA through out
The 200Ω resistor has 20V across it all the time, regardless of what the switch is doing in that parallel circuit, so nothing about the 200Ω changes to cause its current to change.
 
  • #31
Oh really wow!...
The attached circuit is a hybrid circuit breaker.
The voltage controlled switch is used to simulate a mechanical circuit breaker and the Mosfet is to act as my solid state circuit breaker

They are both being controlled by the schmitt trigger

the point of the circuit attached is to interrupt the circuit which is 200Ω supplied by the 20V
to prevent the fault current simulated by the switch in series with the 5Ω closing.

The fault current condition is assumed when the current is at 4.1 and normal condition at 0.1

What i actually expect and this is why i am confused is, if the current in my load(200Ω)
doesnt increase when the switch closes.
how can i say my circuit breaker is interrupting the circuit to prevent a fault condition from remaining in the load.

can you please help me design a Hybrid circuit breaker based on the attachment i sent
i simply need the combination of the M switch +Mosfet to interrupt the circuit which is the 200Ω powered by the 20V supply.
The cause of the simulated fault is the switch in series with the 5Ω closing

I am getting results so to speak but i don't understand them at all.
 

Attachments

  • physics F.jpg
    physics F.jpg
    37.6 KB · Views: 443
Last edited:
  • #32
IRF9530 has a maximum gate voltage of +/-20 volt. Anything higher than this may damage the IRF9530.
See typical curves for IRF9530, +15 volt will probably turn it on.
 
  • #33
Thanks carl
I am not simulating or going to be building with anything higher than +/- 20V

Do you know anything about hybrid circuits
i.e. mechanical switch+mosfet switch
to interrupt a circuit to help protect it
 
  • #34
knowledgeseeki said:
the point of the circuit attached is to interrupt the circuit which is 200Ω supplied by the 20V
to prevent the fault current simulated by the switch in series with the 5Ω closing.
Yes, it will do that (if it works⁂). Your load is simulated by the R25/R26 combination. When the current through them increases beyond 4A the MOSFET switch opens and interrupts the current through them. The fact that R25's current momentarily drops is immaterial, it's the R25/R26 combo that represents your load.

I hope I've managed to explain your design to you. :smile: :smile:

⁂ I see you have a bipolar Schmitt trigger, even though it can't do any more here than can a unipolar Schmitt trigger, and I can't say whether it is correctly designed to do what you want or not. Have you separately tested its trigger levels?
 
  • #35
NascentOxygen said:
Yes, it will do that (if it works⁂). Your load is simulated by the R25/R26 combination. When the current through them increases beyond 4A the MOSFET switch opens and interrupts the current through them. The fact that R25's current momentarily drops is immaterial, it's the R25/R26 combo that represents your load.

I hope I've managed to explain your design to you. :smile: :smile:

⁂ I see you have a bipolar Schmitt trigger, even though it can't do any more here than can a unipolar Schmitt trigger, and I can't say whether it is correctly designed to do what you want or not. Have you separately tested its trigger levels?

yes i have it triggers correctly
when the input is above the upper trigger point the the trigger outputs a low
when it falls below the lower trigger point a high

so i should change my bipolar trigger to a unipolar trigger
ok
When you say the mosfet switch opens you mean turn off to prevent current from flowing through correct.

the r25/26 combination doesn't represent my load the 5Ω is only put there so that the current in the 200Ω increases when the switch closes. 5Ω+switch= simulated fault
200Ω supplied by 20V is my load

are you saying what i put in bold is incorrect, because i actually just want my load to be the 200Ω

sorry i am just a lot confused.

as now i do not see the point of this project i am doing
also my mosfet refuses to turn off

am i correct in saying that when the mosfet turns off, the current at the drain should be 0?

i get the graph attached below when i use a current probe and measure the current at the drain of my mosfet.
Could you please explain why the graph looks like that. i am quite confused.
 

Attachments

  • graph.jpg
    graph.jpg
    61.6 KB · Views: 427
Last edited:
  • #36
knowledgeseeki said:
yes i have it triggers correctly
when the input is above the upper trigger point the the trigger outputs a low
when it falls below the lower trigger point a high

so i should change my bipolar trigger to a unipolar trigger
ok
I didn't say you must change it. I seem to recall designing a unipolar one for you. Besides triggering at particular levels, Schmitt trigger design must also provide the output voltage levels you need. It looks like the one you are using will swing from +Vcc to -Vcc and this is applied to the gate of your MOSFET. I haven't studied the device closely, but I fear that the FET may not appreciate such a negative voltage VGS. The unipolar output of the one I came up with delivered +Vcc to 0V and I think that is all that is needed to operate the MOSFET switch. (But I may be wrong, I'm no expert on this.)

When you say the mosfet switch opens you mean turn off to prevent current from flowing through correct.

Yes. (That is a colloquialism newcomers find very confusing. In electronics we say a switch opens and blocks passage through it; on the farm we say a gate opens and permits passage through.)

the r25/26 combination doesn't represent my load the 5Ω is only put there so that the current in the 200Ω increases when the switch closes. 5Ω+switch= simulated fault
200Ω supplied by 20V is my load

are you saying what i put in bold is incorrect, because i actually just want my load to be the 200Ω

I can only repeat what I said before. The 5Ω in your arrangement cannot increase the current in the 200Ω. (Besides, you would need a voltage of 800V if you wanted 4A in the 200Ω!)

as now i do not see the point of this project i am doing
also my mosfet refuses to turn off

am i correct in saying that when the mosfet turns off, the current at the drain should be 0?
Drain current will be 0 if the FET is not conducting and the design is not badly flawed.

i get the graph attached below when i use a current probe and measure the current at the drain of my mosfet.
Could you please explain why the graph looks like that. i am quite confused.

This needs close examination. My first thoughts are that current may be syphoning through protection diodes in the FET, going from +Vcc via R26 to the -Vcc at the output of your Schmitt trigger. I leave it to you to look at the FET's data sheet and determine whether such diodes are present. Can you probe the current in the 47Ω resistor?

Alternatively, to test my theory, change your 47Ω resistor from the Schmitt trigger to something much higher, say 470kΩ and take another look at this rogue current. If I'm right, it's not going into the drain structure, it's skirting around it via protection diodes.

Far from it being a waste of time, I believe you are learning a lot from this exercise. :wink:
 
  • #37
NascentOxygen said:
I didn't say you must change it. I seem to recall designing a unipolar one for you. Besides triggering at particular levels, Schmitt trigger design must also provide the output voltage levels you need. It looks like the one you are using will swing from +Vcc to -Vcc and this is applied to the gate of your MOSFET. I haven't studied the device closely, but I fear that the FET may not appreciate such a negative voltage VGS. The unipolar output of the one I came up with delivered +Vcc to 0V and I think that is all that is needed to operate the MOSFET switch. (But I may be wrong, I'm no expert on this.)
Yes. (That is a colloquialism newcomers find very confusing. In electronics we say a switch opens and blocks passage through it; on the farm we say a gate opens and permits passage through.)
I can only repeat what I said before. The 5Ω in your arrangement cannot increase the current in the 200Ω. (Besides, you would need a voltage of 800V if you wanted 4A in the 200Ω!)Drain current will be 0 if the FET is not conducting and the design is not badly flawed.
This needs close examination. My first thoughts are that current may be syphoning through protection diodes in the FET, going from +Vcc via R26 to the -Vcc at the output of your Schmitt trigger. I leave it to you to look at the FET's data sheet and determine whether such diodes are present. Can you probe the current in the 47Ω resistor?

Alternatively, to test my theory, change your 47Ω resistor from the Schmitt trigger to something much higher, say 470kΩ and take another look at this rogue current. If I'm right, it's not going into the drain structure, it's skirting around it via protection diodes.

Far from it being a waste of time, I believe you are learning a lot from this exercise. :wink:
increasing the 47ohm resistance to 470kΩ did remedy the situation.

So can you please explain to me the fault condition i tried to simulate, since it is now obvious the fault condition is not the current in the 200Ω increasing.
What is the fault then?

Quick question. Before the fault current at t=0 should my mosfet be normally on or normally off?
i.e. i want to know if my mosfet turns on to interrupt the circuit thus stopping the fault current or turns off to interrupt the circuit

thank you so much for your support
 
Last edited:
  • #38
knowledgeseeki said:
increasing the 47ohm resistance to 470kΩ did remedy the situation.
Well, it may appear to, but that is not a proper fix. No good design places reliance on a device's protection circuit for normal operation.

So can you please explain to me the fault condition i tried to simulate, since it is now obvious the fault condition is not the current in the 200Ω increasing.
What is the fault then?
It is working as you designed. Your load is the combination R25//R26. Normally this load carries a particular current, but if something happens to cause its current to rise to about 4A the MOSFET opens and interrupts the load current. There is no way here that you could cause the current in the actual 200Ω resistor to jump to 4A while still maintaining that resistor as 200Ω. You would need either 800V or else you'd have to somehow make it change its resistance from 200Ω to 5Ω. You can't attack that colourful resistor without spoiling its paintwork, so you have switched a 5Ω in parallel with it to simulate its change of resistance.

Quick question. Before the fault current at t=0 should my mosfet be normally on or normally off?
i.e. i want to know if my mosfet turns on to interrupt the circuit thus stopping the fault current or turns off to interrupt the circuit
The MOSFET has to be ON to be conducting current.

thank you so much for your support
My pleasure. :smile:
 
  • #39
Thank you so much once again
I am having an issue though my output keeps oscillating therefore my mosfet doesnt' stay off because of it.

using a bipolar trigger how do i set my hysteresis values to -1V for lower and 3V for upper

bipolar trigger is used because this ensures that the current in my mosfet stays well below zero. no chance of it switching if bipolar is used.
 

Attachments

  • physics F.jpg
    physics F.jpg
    37.7 KB · Views: 684
  • #40
Is that 470 Ohms for R39 correct?
 
  • #41
yes 470
47K or 470k was simply too big and is improper to put such high resistances at the mosfet gate
 
  • #42
knowledgeseeki said:
yes 470
47K or 470k was simply too big and is improper to put such high resistances at the mosfet gate
Why are high values not allowed?
 
  • #43
Because the gate of a mosfet is a capacitor, and the mosfet won't turn on (or off) until it is charged (or discharged). A big resistor will slow it down tremendously.
 
Last edited:
  • #44
knowledgeseeki said:
Because the gate of a mosfet is a capacitor, and the mosfet won't turn on (or off) until it is charged (or discharged). A big resistor will slow it down tremendously.
Okay. Might not be an issue here, where you are allowing the protection zeners to conduct.

I calculate the Schmitt trigger levels here[/color] as already precisely 3V and -1V. Are you saying it is repetitively resetting?
 
  • #45
The trigger levels are determined by applying Kirchoff's current law, saying the sum of the currents into pin 3 of the IC = 0.
 
  • #46
yes it repetitively setting
and the reference voltage doesn't even fall to -1
it starts from zero reaches a high point and simply oscillates
 
  • #47
I'd like to see more of the operation. Can you provide a graph of the current through the 1Ω, the 470Ω, and the 200Ω, all related one underneath the other?

After you have those plots, change the 470Ω back to 470kΩ and see whether it still oscillates.
 
  • #48
for 200ohm, 1ohm and 470ohm
 

Attachments

  • physics F.jpg
    physics F.jpg
    61.7 KB · Views: 461
  • #49
470k
200
1 ohm
note: large resistance in front of the gate makes the mosfet switch a lot slower than it should
 

Attachments

  • physics F.jpg
    physics F.jpg
    56.6 KB · Views: 476
  • #50
knowledgeseeki said:
for 200ohm, 1ohm and 470ohm
Before 1ms, the currents are all zero, so it's not even switched on? It should be showing currents, shouldn't it? :confused:

Then we see at 1ms the current in the 200Ω jumps to 0.05A and remains there, and the current in the 1Ω jumps to around 1.75A? :bugeye: So this must be the overload condition, when I was expecting about 3A, so it means the Schmitt trigger (needing 3V) will never be triggered.

Try doubling that 20V supply to increase the current so the Schmitt will switch. Can you choose a colour other than "green" (on my monitor it appears a faint yellow). We need the voltage across the MOSFET during this time, too.

Perhaps we need to take steps to ensure the Schmitt trigger always powers up in a state that keeps the MOSFET on.

Your second graph is inexplicable. That scale is microamperes? :eek:

Before you do any of the above, I think you should take that 470Ω off the Schmitt trigger and return it to a 15V source, then to a -15V source, to make sure the MOSFET is being turned on and off by these levels. Monitor the MOSFET current, and the voltage across it.
 
Back
Top