Circular motion -- Find the angular velocity at t=3

Click For Summary
To find the angular velocity at t=3, the integration of angular acceleration, given as 2t, leads to an expression for angular velocity as t^2. However, the initial angular velocity must also be considered, which complicates the calculation. The discussion reveals confusion regarding the initial conditions, particularly whether the initial tangential velocity was -0.5 m/s. There is uncertainty about the provided answer of 5.43, suggesting a possible typo in the source material. The conversation emphasizes the importance of clarifying initial conditions and the direction of tangential acceleration.
jisbon
Messages
475
Reaction score
30
Homework Statement
Consider a object going circular motion of radius 0.14m, angular acceleration is given by a(t) = 2t The tangential velocity at t=0 is 0.5m/s
Find angular velocity at t=3
Relevant Equations
tangential acc = r * angular acc
Hi everyone. Do correct me if I am thinking wrongly.
So to find angular velocity, won't I just have to integrate angular acc = 2t, which means angular velocity = t^2? Hence, won't the answer be 3^2=9?
The answer seems to be 5.43 :/
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have ignored the initial angular velocity. ω = ω0 + ∫a(t)dt.
That still doesn't give the given answer. Are you sure the initial tangential velocity wasn't -0.5 m/s? Either you or the book seems to have made a typo.
 
Figured out the intial angular velocity part.
Regarding the negative, will check back with my tutors. Find it weird too :/
 
jisbon said:
Figured out the intial angular velocity part.
Regarding the negative, will check back with my tutors. Find it weird too :/
Did you quote it word for word? Was there a diagram?
 
This part of the question was just added: Assume tangential acc is opposite to tangential velocity, hence the negative
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
67
Views
4K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
879
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K