Circular motion: net work after one period

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the net work done on a child on a merry-go-round after one complete rotation. Although initial calculations suggest a significant amount of work, it is clarified that the net work is actually zero. This is because the centripetal force acting on the child is always perpendicular to the displacement during uniform circular motion. Consequently, the scalar product of force and displacement results in zero work done. Thus, the net work after one full rotation is confirmed to be 0 Joules.
nx01
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



"A 40 kg child sitting 6.0 m from the center of a merry-go-round has a constant speed of 6.0 m/s. The net work (in Joules) done on the child after making one complete circle on the merry-go-round is?"

Homework Equations



a=V^2/r
F=ma
C=2pi*r

The Attempt at a Solution



C ≈ 37.7 m
a = 6 m/s
F at a point = (40)(6) = 240 N
Net work ≈ (240)(37.7) ≈ 9048 J

My question is, is the net work actually 0 J after one full rotation on the merry-go-round, since force is a vector quantity, and the force in one-half of the circular motion negates the force in the other half for each point?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are right and you are wrong... the work is indeed zero, but actually not only on a full rounf, every time... indeed the work is the scalar product of the force times the displacement vector... and in an uniform circular motion the acceleration (and hence the force) is the centripetal one only, and is perpendicular ALWAYS to the displacement, so that the scalar product is identically zero
 
Thank you :)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top