Circular Motion of a roller coaster

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about calculating the work done by frictional forces in a roller coaster physics project, it is clarified that the direction of friction always opposes the motion of the marble. This means that friction acts tangentially to the track at any point along the roller coaster. When the marble is on the side of the loop or at the top, friction continues to act in a direction that opposes its motion. However, the magnitude of the friction force is complex to determine, especially for a rolling object like a marble, as rolling without slipping results in no sliding friction.
xkittenx
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Alrighty.. I was just wondering if you'd be able to help me out with a quick little problem I have. For physics we had to build a roller coaster, i am in the process of calculating the work done by the frictional forces throughout the course. Here's the question; In loopdy loops, when the marble is on the side of the loop, where does the force of friction point? what about when the marble is at the top of the loop? I know where the normal force and gravity point, but am unsure as to whether friction applies in these case. Thanx :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
friction opposes slipping

The friction would always be opposed to the motion of the marble. So its direction will always be tangential to the track at any point.

Of course, the magnitude of the friction force is another thing. I don't see any easy way to calculate it, especially for a rolling object like a marble. (If the marble is rolling without slipping, there will be no sliding friction.)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top