Circular motion vertical force

AI Thread Summary
In horizontal circular motion influenced by gravity, an object cannot maintain a completely horizontal string without a vertical force component. If the string is horizontal, it exerts only horizontal force, requiring another force, like normal force, to counteract gravity. For an object in uniform circular motion above ground, the string must have some vertical angle to provide necessary tension. Without this angle, the object would not be able to remain in circular motion due to the lack of vertical support. Understanding these forces is crucial for analyzing circular motion dynamics.
ramanakumars
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,
If you have a horizontal circular motion (with gravity action on the object), what holds the object up in the horizontal plane? All vertical components of the tension go to zero when the angle with the vertical axis is 90°... Where am I going wrong?

Thanks

Ramana
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why would the angle with the vertical axis be 90° rather than something a bit less than that?
 
Do you mean to say that even theoretically, you cannot have an object in uniform circular motion completely with the attached string completely horizontal?
 
ramanakumars said:
Do you mean to say that even theoretically, you cannot have an object in uniform circular motion completely with the attached string completely horizontal?
Right. For the reason that you are pointing out. If the string were horizontal, there would be no vertical component of force.
 
ramanakumars said:
Do you mean to say that even theoretically, you cannot have an object in uniform circular motion completely with the attached string completely horizontal?

In that case, the force the string exerts on the body is horizontal, so there must be another force that compensates the weight force. If the body is doing its horizontal uniform circular motion sliding on horizantal ground, then it is the normal (support) force that compensates the weight.

If the body is doing its horizontal uniform circular motion above ground, and there is no other force acting on the body (just the weight and the tension of the string), then the string can not be totally horizontal.
 
I see... Thanks for clearing that up guys! Makes perfect sense!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top