Circular motion with respect to south pole

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a homework problem involving circular motion centered at the south pole, labeled "O." The participant is tasked with finding the force and period of motion for a point moving in a circle with radius R, where the force is directed towards "O." There is confusion regarding the application of Newton's second law and the relationship between radial and tangential acceleration. A suggestion is made to use geometric methods to analyze the acceleration components, emphasizing the need for clarity in understanding the motion's dynamics. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying physics principles to solve the problem effectively.
duxy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The south pole of the circular motion is labeled "O" and it's the center of the xOy axes. The point leaves "O" to the right increasing it's positional vector(\bar{}r) dimension and the \alpha angle (the angle is between the positional vector and the Ox axis). The force that keeps the material point on the circular motion is always pointed towards "O". The north pole is labeled "A" and at that specific point the velocity is v_{}0. The radius of the circle is R. Find the force F and the period T.

Homework Equations


r=r(\alpha)
F=ma
v(subscript-alpha)=r(first derivative of alpha)
r^2*(first derivative of alpha)=c

The Attempt at a Solution


If the centripetal force applies i think F=-m(c^2/r^4)r(\alpha)
If i know the force i can compute the T as T=-(2*pi*m*\vec{}r)/F
Can someone please explain if this is right and if not i am open to suggestions :) Thanks
Sorry for not using the subscripts, but the preview looked kinda weird.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi duxy! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(what is c? and where does your r4 come from? :confused:)

Can I check that I understand the question correctly?

An object moves under no constraint (and no gravity), but subject to a force always directed towards O: find how the force depends on position P if the body moves in a circle through O.

Is that correct?

If so, then good ol' Newton's second law means that the component of acceleration perpendicular to OP must always be zero.

Hint: find the radial and tangential acceleration relative to the centre of the circle (because that's fairly easy! :wink:), and from that find the components along and perpendicular to OP. :smile:
 
Hey, thanks for the reply and the welcome. About that c it's supposed to be a constant i haven't really figured it out yet. About Newton's second law, the component of acceleration perpendicular to OP is always zero when O is the center and P is a point on the circle, in that case the radial acceleration is always perpendicular on the linear velocity, but if O is at the south point of the circle the tangent line that goes through P is not perpendicular to OP anymore(i think).

On the other hand i guess that when P is a 2R distance away from O the acceleration components have the same value and direction.

Are you implying to find the components along and perpendicular to OP geometrically or is there some kind of connection between them in this particular case?

Thank you
 
duxy said:
… in that case the radial acceleration is always perpendicular on the linear velocity, but if O is at the south point of the circle the tangent line that goes through P is not perpendicular to OP anymore(i think).

Sorry, I don't follow any of that. :confused:

First use geometry to find the acceleration.

Use the centre of the circle as I suggested.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top