Circular motion with respect to south pole

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a homework problem involving circular motion centered at the south pole, labeled "O." The participant is tasked with finding the force and period of motion for a point moving in a circle with radius R, where the force is directed towards "O." There is confusion regarding the application of Newton's second law and the relationship between radial and tangential acceleration. A suggestion is made to use geometric methods to analyze the acceleration components, emphasizing the need for clarity in understanding the motion's dynamics. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying physics principles to solve the problem effectively.
duxy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The south pole of the circular motion is labeled "O" and it's the center of the xOy axes. The point leaves "O" to the right increasing it's positional vector(\bar{}r) dimension and the \alpha angle (the angle is between the positional vector and the Ox axis). The force that keeps the material point on the circular motion is always pointed towards "O". The north pole is labeled "A" and at that specific point the velocity is v_{}0. The radius of the circle is R. Find the force F and the period T.

Homework Equations


r=r(\alpha)
F=ma
v(subscript-alpha)=r(first derivative of alpha)
r^2*(first derivative of alpha)=c

The Attempt at a Solution


If the centripetal force applies i think F=-m(c^2/r^4)r(\alpha)
If i know the force i can compute the T as T=-(2*pi*m*\vec{}r)/F
Can someone please explain if this is right and if not i am open to suggestions :) Thanks
Sorry for not using the subscripts, but the preview looked kinda weird.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi duxy! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(what is c? and where does your r4 come from? :confused:)

Can I check that I understand the question correctly?

An object moves under no constraint (and no gravity), but subject to a force always directed towards O: find how the force depends on position P if the body moves in a circle through O.

Is that correct?

If so, then good ol' Newton's second law means that the component of acceleration perpendicular to OP must always be zero.

Hint: find the radial and tangential acceleration relative to the centre of the circle (because that's fairly easy! :wink:), and from that find the components along and perpendicular to OP. :smile:
 
Hey, thanks for the reply and the welcome. About that c it's supposed to be a constant i haven't really figured it out yet. About Newton's second law, the component of acceleration perpendicular to OP is always zero when O is the center and P is a point on the circle, in that case the radial acceleration is always perpendicular on the linear velocity, but if O is at the south point of the circle the tangent line that goes through P is not perpendicular to OP anymore(i think).

On the other hand i guess that when P is a 2R distance away from O the acceleration components have the same value and direction.

Are you implying to find the components along and perpendicular to OP geometrically or is there some kind of connection between them in this particular case?

Thank you
 
duxy said:
… in that case the radial acceleration is always perpendicular on the linear velocity, but if O is at the south point of the circle the tangent line that goes through P is not perpendicular to OP anymore(i think).

Sorry, I don't follow any of that. :confused:

First use geometry to find the acceleration.

Use the centre of the circle as I suggested.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top