Circular trajectory traveled by a charged particle in a magnetic field

AI Thread Summary
The Lorentz force acting on a charged particle in a magnetic field causes centripetal acceleration, maintaining circular motion. The relationship between the centripetal force and Lorentz force leads to the formula r = mv/qB for the radius of the particle's trajectory. Concerns arise regarding negatively charged particles, as the formula suggests a negative radius, which seems nonsensical. However, the trajectory remains unchanged except for the direction of the Lorentz force, which is inverted for negative charges. Ultimately, the radius should be expressed in terms of its magnitude, ensuring r is always positive.
greg_rack
Gold Member
Messages
361
Reaction score
79
Homework Statement
Derive the general formula for the radius of the trajectory traveled by a charged particle in a magnetic field ##\vec{B}## perpendicular to its velocity ##\vec{v}##.
Relevant Equations
Centripetal force: ##F_{C}=\frac{mv^2}{r}##
The Lorentz's force acting on a charged particle perpendicularly "hitting" a magnetic field will be directed upwards, and generally directed towards the center of the circumference traveled by this particle, and so will cause a centripetal acceleration to keep it in a circular motion.
By equalling the centripetal force formula which causes this acceleration, to the Lorentz's force acting on the particle(considering ##\theta = 90^{\circ}##), will give us:
$$qvB=\frac{mv^2}{r}\rightarrow r=\frac{mv}{qB}$$
Now, my question is: how do we treat negatively charged particles? By this formula, wouldn't their radiuses be ##<0##, since ##r\propto \frac{1}{q}##?
I can't understand why we don't use the absolute value of ##q##, since(correct me if I'm wrong), even in case of a negative charge the trajectory doesn't change, apart from the Lorentz's force direction(which would be inverted).
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi
Physics news on Phys.org
greg_rack said:
apart from the Lorentz's force direction(which would be inverted).
Right ! So the trajectory curves in the opposite direction !
 
  • Like
Likes greg_rack
Bear in mind that a force is a vector: it has magnitude and a direction.
The expression for the Lorentz force is a vector equation and all three of ##q##, ##\vec v ## and ##\vec B## determine the direction. Your ##r= {mv\over qB}## is written as a scalar equation containing only magnitudes (and units).
 
  • Like
Likes greg_rack
greg_rack said:
Homework Statement:: Derive the general formula for the radius of the trajectory traveled by a charged particle in a magnetic field ##\vec{B}## perpendicular to its velocity ##\vec{v}##.
Relevant Equations:: Centripetal force: ##F_{C}=\frac{mv^2}{r}##

The Lorentz's force acting on a charged particle perpendicularly "hitting" a magnetic field will be directed upwards, and generally directed towards the center of the circumference traveled by this particle, and so will cause a centripetal acceleration to keep it in a circular motion.
By equalling the centripetal force formula which causes this acceleration, to the Lorentz's force acting on the particle(considering ##\theta = 90^{\circ}##), will give us:
$$qvB=\frac{mv^2}{r}\rightarrow r=\frac{mv}{qB}$$
Now, my question is: how do we treat negatively charged particles? By this formula, wouldn't their radiuses be ##<0##, since ##r\propto \frac{1}{q}##?
I can't understand why we don't use the absolute value of ##q##, since(correct me if I'm wrong), even in case of a negative charge the trajectory doesn't change, apart from the Lorentz's force direction(which would be inverted).
Yes, it's the magnitude of the whole thing:$$r=\big | \frac{mv}{qB} \big |$$
 
  • Like
Likes greg_rack
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top