How does the wave pendulum in Citadel Physics create its mesmerizing pattern?

AI Thread Summary
The wave pendulum in Citadel Physics creates a mesmerizing pattern through carefully tuned, uncoupled pendulums that follow specific aliasing rules. Observers note how the waves move in and out in a rhythmic sequence, enhancing the visual appeal. The discussion highlights the impressive nature of the simulation, with participants expressing appreciation for the accompanying video. The intricate movements of the pendulums contribute to the overall aesthetic experience. This phenomenon showcases the beauty of physics in motion.
Messages
19,791
Reaction score
10,748
This is neat how the waves go in order then out then back in and out and back in!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1M8ciWSgc_k
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hah yeah;
The pendulums are not coupled - but I notice they are carefully tuned.
 
Aliasing rules here.
Great movie, btw.
 
Fantastic! Thank you for that.
 
Very nice clip!
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top