Citing objections in a poster presentation

AI Thread Summary
In preparing a poster presentation, it's essential to focus on showcasing the research clearly and concisely rather than including objections or criticisms, such as feedback from journal editors. A poster should highlight the problem being addressed, summarize the methodology, present key results, and offer brief discussion points. Including a history of the project or extensive critiques may detract from the main focus and interest. While it's ultimately up to the presenter how to structure the poster, a concise presentation is likely to engage viewers more effectively and stimulate discussion about the work.
rogerharris
Messages
125
Reaction score
0
i'm doing a poster presentation of a paper i have written and would like to include both objections and agreement with the paper in a separate box for each called strengths and weaknesses

if for example a journal editor gave me a lot of corrections or weaknesses which helped develop particular models can i incorporate them and mention how his feedback helped illustrate a weakness of the model ?

I'm going to write to them anyway, but just in case they don't get back in time i would be wondering what its ok to quote..e.g. in a paper you can say something like (personal correspondence, smith 2009)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think I understand why anyone would want to do something like this.

The point of a poster is to showcase your research. It's usually not the place to cite objections or criticisms from journal editors.

Imagine, for example, I am a professor in your field. I come strolling along down the poster aisle and stop in front of your poster. What do you want me to see?

In general I like to see:
- a clear presentation of the problem you're working on
- a quick summary of the methodology used
- the important results this work has generated
- a few brief discussion points

People don't want to see a history of the project in a poster. If they want details, they'll ask. The poster is, in my opinion, supposed to serve as both a trigger and reference point for discussion of your work.

Of course, it's a poster. You can really do what you want with it. But my experience has found that you'll get a lot more interest if you keep it consise.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top