B Clapeyron's Theorem: Explaining the 1/2 and Why It Matters

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Zouatine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Clapeyron theorem and the concept of work done by forces. It clarifies that the factor of 1/2 in the theorem arises because the force is not constant during displacement, particularly in scenarios like spring extension. The conversation also touches on Maxwell-Betti's theorem, explaining that the absence of 1/2 in W' is due to the application of a constant force. The distinction between constant and variable forces is emphasized, with examples illustrating how energy is distributed between work done and kinetic energy. Overall, the thread provides insights into the mathematical and physical implications of these theorems.
Zouatine
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I am new here, so hi for all ^-^
I have a problem in the Clapeyron theorem, the work of a force by definition is equal to the force multiplied by the displacement, and in this theorem it says that the work = (1/2) * force * displacement. why there is 1/2 ?

I also saw Maxwell-Betti's theorem
it's says: we have a corp with two forces F1 and F2 and the displacement d1 of the force F1 and d2 of the force F2 so:
W = W1 + W2 + W '
W = [(1/2) * (F1) * (d1)] + [(1/2) * (F2) * (d2)] + [(F1) * (d ')]
d = displacement of the application point F1 under the effect of the force F2.
why there is no 1/2 in W '?

Thank you 'excuse my English is not good'
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because the force is not constant. Work = ∫Fdx = ∫kxdx = 1/2 kd2
This assumes equilibrium static displacement. If you apply a constant force F, the work done will be Fd. What happens to the extra energy?
 
Thanx Sir for your answer .I understand. But what is the physical sens of à force is not constant?
 
I mean what's the différence between a constant force and à force is not constante un the displacement of the beam.
 
Suppose you extend a spring by applying just enough force to extend it a little bit, then a little bit more, and so on, so that it is in equilibrium throughout the process. Strictly speaking this would take infinitely long, but imagine we approximate this by applying a force dF so that it extends by dx, where dF = kdx; then increase the force to 2dF and the extension to 2dx, and so on. At each step we apply a force F = kx and it moves through a distance dx, so the work done is Fdx = kxdx. If you integrate this from 0 to d, the work is 1/2 kd2 = 1/2 Fdd.
Now instead suppose you apply a constant force F = kd to the spring (e.g. by attaching a mass to it and letting go.) When it has extended to the equilibrium extension d the work done is Fd. But the energy stored in the spring is 1/2 Fd, just as in the first case. The remainder of the energy is the kinetic energy of the mass, which oscillates about the equilibrium displacement d.
Clapeyron is considering the first case.
 
I get it , thanks for your help Sir.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top